Originally Posted by
sizheng
But drivers like M7H found it very good for his driving, so just keep it and wait for the better one comes out.)
And I will!
Maybe I will try the 110211 tonight (thanks Angelo!) but I have the feeling it will not outperform 101224...
Originally Posted by
Shawn68z
Maybe HW could put a safety into the software that would make sure it turned off if the input voltage is OVER 4.3V ? This would prevent people from trying to run a high timing in their 2S Touring Cars.
Then I can not charge my lipo's to 4.4V anymore....
Originally Posted by
sizheng
Thanks Shawn.
We will do more test under 1S situation.
Actually the motor performance and efficiency under 1S is different from
higher voltage. I think this is the reason it needs different settings (maybe also different method )for boost and turbo.
Please do some 1S testing, to see what Shawn and I mean!...
Also try the 101224 then ofcourse!...
But keep in mind, my settings work really good with an LRP X12 motor, but not on a LRP X11....
Don't ask me why, maybe you can do something with that information....
Maybe you can bring out a firmware dedicated for 1S...
Originally Posted by
hacker
instead of using 64 steps, I think it would be easier for the majority of people to understand using 100 steps or 100% boost timing.
Originally Posted by
COBRARACING
Great idea makes sense.
Certainly a great idea!
Sometimes it's so simple...
Only don't make it 100 steps, because then you keep on pushing buttons, if you want to go down in a setting.
Lets change 2% at a time (to save memory in the speedo)...
