Originally Posted by JR007

Also Mr Novak, it means buying yet another ESC for many of us. I'd rather not go down that path if I could help it. Good for ESC manufacturers I guess....True

I think the best outcome to be honest is an ESC checker to be made/used that ROAR can plug, say, a Tekin RS into, go through the throttle range, and confirm it's not providing more timing. That way there is no confusion over what software is or isn't doing and allow ROAR to make easier decisions. This isn't possible in regards to "easily done."
Also, fixed timing motors are a great idea period. If one is stronger than another, then that's the manufacturers point-of-difference.This is the main reason to run sensoreless. There are too many varieances and tolerances to product "locked timing" mfg to mfg readings. Remove the sensors during the drive and there is a ceiling that no amount of engineering can change.