Originally Posted by
dnebout
OK. I admit that I did have to Google Occam's Razor. It is a good theory and 9 times out of 10 the obvious reason is the only reason.
Sure, but what if he's #10? I don't think negative feedback is warranted. Neutral at best, but not negative. I understand you were out money, but he did refund the full amount. A scammer would have never responded to anything and you would still be out money. Just my .02.