Originally Posted by
odpurple
Hey Yang, Chris-
I don't want to get in the middle of your "discussion"
but for what it is worth, in the testing we have done here the guys seem to agree that single cell 13.5 is faster that 4 cell 17.5
Actually Michael that was never the issue; the "debate" was sparked because Yang decided to call me out after he made the erronious statment that motor for motor is a closer parity than 13.5/lipo and I questioned his statement. For the record I never said thay were even only that the 13.5 is a better option than motor for motor, a point that I was able to back up with Yang's data. But just to put this to bed here it is again point blank. Per Yang's data his 13.5/lipo car was one lap faster than his 17.5/nimh. But per his previous post:
Originally Posted by
theisgroup
you will not be competative 4cell vs. lipo. no testing needed. guys that I usually run along side with, I was putting laps on this weekend. they ran lipo and 1 ran 4cell. i guarantee that winning this way is no fun. I just gotta get another lipo for my 17.5 car. the split of the class will not last long. I know the guys down there in SA.
Notice the part I bolded and underlined, Yang was mutiple laps up in a motor for motor run.
So as I stated before, and just proved again, the 13.5 lipo car is a closer parity than motor for motor; one lap vs mutiple laps. And to you Yang if your going to throw around insults I suggest that you have the facts to back your position next time.
Originally Posted by
EricF
Hmm... you'd think that more people would see that difference and we'd not have the unnecessary but good for the soul discussions
E
Hey get off the porch and start running 1/12 again
