R/C Tech Forums - View Single Post - Go-Tech Engines Thread
View Single Post
Old 04-02-2009 | 06:49 PM
  #6272  
RETRO RC's Avatar
RETRO RC
Tech Addict
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 715
From: AUCKLAND NEW ZEALAND
Default

Originally Posted by aaronmn
The TTR/AE 2035 pipe works great. JP-3 worked ok, not as well as the 2035 and don't laugh but I also ran a JP-1 on the 7PT and actually preferred that over the JP-3. Weather it was the short track, conditions or what the day I tested them that is just how I felt. Next combo I try is the 2035 with a short header or Mugen/MSR 1005. (both of those combos I've had great luck with on engines with simlar bore and stroke) TTR/AE 2035 is relatively inexpensive, if you get a chance pick one up and give it a try. MSR 1005 not so cheap but if you can find it, it's a good pipe.

I have run the Mugen Carbon shoes and thought they worked pretty decent. IMO the carbon TTR/AE shoes are ok too. Currently running the impulse hard shoes in most stuff and AE 1.0 springs.
Yes the jp-1 pipe gives the 7port more bottom end so it makes it "feel" more aggressive than the jp-3.

The 2035 is a good pipe fpr the 7 but your better to go for a longer header not a shorter one as you'll lose bottom end and it'll feel sluggish out of corners and into jumps with short runups.

when I ran the 2035 pipe these where my combos

7port 2035 with long header (increases bottom end without losing noticable top end)
5port 2035 with short header ( increases the 5 ports top end with out losing noticable bottom end)

Although the fuel economy isn't as good as say the 2047 or the 0801 pipes its still not to bad.

Adrian
RETRO RC is offline