R/C Tech Forums - View Single Post - 1/12 forum
Thread: 1/12 forum
View Single Post
Old 04-28-2008 | 09:37 PM
  #28585  
boscoj's Avatar
boscoj
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 142
From: Menlo Park, CA
Default

Originally Posted by odpurple
9602 is a better servo IMO. I don't know about the weight but the 9602 is a metal gear servo, the 9650 is not. Both servos are exactly the same size, so your information there is wrong.
Hey OD, don't mean to bust bawls but I have a few things to say about my servo inquiry.

We don't "know" each other. I've met you twice. I appreciate the time you've taken with me in person.

For future reference, when I say this "thing" is larger and heavier this is because I believe what I say. Call it a "belief engine". That which I know to be true, finite, becomes, in my mind, a belief.

So I take mild offense in your statement . . .
"Both servos are exactly the same size, so your information there is wrong."

If I were not an asshole I would let this lay. But I am an asshole. Being a noob on this forum and have vested trust in your advice I feel obligated to inform you of the physical and performance attributes of these two servos. The Futaba S9650 and the S9602.

Side by side specs . . .


The S9650 on my scale tipped out at 24.1, minus horn and screw . . . prolly 2 grams . . .


The S9602 . . .


Tall S9650 . . .


Tall S9602 . . .


Wide S9650 . . .


Wide S9602 . . .


When I "say" something I mean it . ..

That is all . ..

Last edited by boscoj; 04-28-2008 at 09:59 PM.
boscoj is offline