R/C Tech Forums - View Single Post - The Port Debate...
View Single Post
Old 12-23-2007, 11:03 PM
  #20  
houston
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
 
houston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sherwood,OR
Posts: 15,844
Trader Rating: 96 (100%+)
Default

the v specs also have a bigger bore and a short stroke . they were designed similar to the older top sbk line of engines from novarossi more cubic displacement = more air fuel mixture=great power . if i wasnt such a novarossi believer os would be my next engine of choice

and agreeing with maximo in porting beliefs more ports doesnt necessarily mean more top less low , just means you can create a more controllable and useable powerband effect to an engine , im not so stoked on the 367 design yet though . they run good but very odd to have 2 vertical transfer ports actually under the b type exhaust ports and a huge picco like compression relief port
later , monty

Last edited by houston; 12-24-2007 at 10:05 AM.
houston is offline