Originally Posted by ljohnson
For those of you wondering, the setup changes between the MS and not MS version:
Std blocks are A,A in front A,E in the rear with the plastic uprights (3 degrees toe)
The MS version is built with 1A,1A in front and 1XB,1D in the rear, but with 1mm spacers under all of the blocks. This is equivalent to A,A and XB*,D, so I don't really see why they didn't use the evo blocks, unless it's to give us the option to lower the blocks. Have any of you tried this ?
The rear toe is the same 3 degrees but the MS is narrower in the rear.
In the stock settings the roll centers are the same - same hinge pin height and camber link height.
The rear sway bar is different - narrower in the MS and it mounts on the balls on the out side front of the arm rather than the inside. Is this how the 415 is?
*XB doesn't exist as far as I know
"X" series blocks only appears for the 415/415MS series cars. Kilruf mentioned above it is 1mm lower in roll center. and also allows you to narrow the stance a little bit.
here are the blocks from narrowest to widest from the 415/evoIV
1XD
1XC
1XB
1XA
1X | X
1A | A
1B | B
1C | C
1D |D
-- | E
so it looks like they duplicated the evoIV set up on the evoIV MS BUT the narrowed the width of the car in the rear.