R/C Tech Forums - View Single Post - Sensored vs Sensorless
View Single Post
Old 04-23-2025 | 06:14 PM
  #8  
OffRoadJunkie's Avatar
OffRoadJunkie
Tech Champion
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 6,306
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by godkingtitan
which is more reliable? I would think sensorless would be more reliable
bottom line, if you want more precise control and a higher speed, then a sensored motor is the best route to go. If you want a less expensive motor, then a sensorless motor is the way to go. When it comes to reliability, 99.9% of the time, a sensor cable will go bad due to not unplugging it properly. I know this because I don't know anyone who plugs and unplugs a sensor cable more than I do, and I do it dozens of times before the cable goes bad. If you are worried about a motor being over worked with a sensor cable connected, make sure you don't turn your timing up past 40* and keep your motor temps under 120*. If the temps get too high, back off on the timing until you get the right temp. I have a sensored motor that is over 3 years old. I slapped in a new $35 rotor and it's back to performing almost like new.

Trust me, even if you're just bashing around a lot, a sensorless motor can be very glitchy when you're on and off the throttle or at low speeds. When your car is not running smooth, it can kill the fun.
OffRoadJunkie is offline