Originally Posted by
RC10Nick
It can - it has an option for a pulse that's ~500 to 1000us, though it doesn't look like you can use that to run a higher response servo. It's hard to take you seriously when you don't know what you're talking about.
Anyway, I can feel what I feel regardless of what you believe.
And like I said, other top of the line radios and servos offer pwm frequencies significantly higher than 400hz, so elrs can't claim to be a totl system of it can't offer the same features. The devs are too ignorant of the surface market know elrs is deficient in that regard, and because they clearly have the same attitude as you, they will undoubtedly stay ignorant of it's shortcomings.
When you say "it can...." What can?
Look. I'm just saying, you created an "issue" on the ExpressLRS Github saying you can't get extended PWM range in F1000 mode. ExpressLRS doesn't currently support extended PWM range in F1000. so, it is working as intended. It is not a bug or unintentional behavior. It does not belong in an issue. People responded and told you what you needed to do to get extended PWM range. The extended PWM at 333Hz would've worked for the exact set-up you presented (a PWM receiver to a 333Hz servo). It's not an issue, and yet people tried to help you. They were right to close it. And then you claim they are being ignorant and not listening. Making this request for extended PWM is fine. Wanting it with higher packet rate is fine. But do it in a discussion post and not with a demanding tone to volunteers that put their heart into this project for everyone's benefit. I can't believe you can't see that.