Originally Posted by
trilerian
The idea with this is to put a load on your test motor. Why is that important, I don't know, go read through the many posts that state how motor analysers give unloaded outputs and how they would be better if there were a load on them. But regardless, one of the things you can do is see how much of an rpm drop you have under certain loads. If you are looking for top speed down the straight use a lower load or higher value resistors. If you are looking for more pull out of corners use a lower value resistor for more load. Compare rpm drop from different timing settings. You can also do the same old test where you plot the rpm vs current draw for different timing and find where the current goes up with not much rpm gain. And you also have the benefit of knowing it was with a load.
Just putting an unknown load on it at a steady state RPM isn't that much better than running unloaded. How do you know what resistor value is appropriate? Why would you use less load to simulate the straight? That's when friction and aerodynamic drag is at its peak. Adding more load to the slave and seeing where RPM tops out doesn't actually tell you how quickly it accelerates.
An analyser has a lot of limitations due to being an unloaded test. But just adding an arbitrary load to the analyser and checking final RPM has most of the same limitations.