Originally Posted by
gigaplex
Your comment literally said pancar diffs. How are we supposed to know you were talking about completely different vehicles?
Serioulsy if you don't want to use your medium talents to decrypt my messages, just tell me!
More seriously, english is not my mothertongue, but now when I read my message again, I understand where I introduced the confusion, Sorry.
Originally Posted by
Erhard
By definition, it is an innovation, as it is new in this class. What you mean is "improvement" or "advantage". And it is an Improvement also for sure. So what remains is an advantage - well if you can use it is also that. And you can use it, but not always.
Anyhow -
At least - Schumacher is offering it - others not (yet). Others may follow and the handout tyre in events may also. If not - no disadvantage, just use a 3 hole adapter/axle. What is so horrable about an adapter buy? It just is really small money compared to the cost of a race weekend or event.
I have a little hope the 3 hole system disappears, its unconvenient (and heavier). OK-you cannot use a diff with those tyres. On the other hand, when you need a diff, you would use different tyres. So I see no need to buy certain tyres in 2 versions (hexagon/3hole). This means no problem at all but the advantagges mentioned, thanks to the innovation.
Best regards, Erhard
Honestly I'm not even sure to properly understand what you typed. It is an innovation because this is new, ok. It is an improvement, that I don't understand why... What was the problem with the 3-screws fixation? And finally how can it be an advantage? How would it benefit the driver?
But my main issue there is the fact that you consider "normal" that people will buy adapters, because there price will be reasonable compared to the common race costs...
If it is the case, why haven't you considered to include them in the kit? Finally that's a lot of parts which are not in the kit, for the same price as the E3...
