Originally Posted by
Losiracer12
I clicked on your link they are a smaller pitch then others which mean less precise of a gear. Compare them closely to others above. This will give the same feeling as a higher deadband value in a servo which is less sensitivity for highly skilled racers. The servos do look great for the prices. AGF site says that they do oem/odm so I am sure they can do finer pitch gears. Just something to think about why some servos feel better on the race track then others in the right hands. I wonder what their deadband spacing is? The lowest deadband spacing I have seen in a servo is the pro performance @1us all the others @2us-4us, I look at everything when I choose a servo for my needs
Not sure I follow your train of thought, having raced on-road for many years, I have learned that racing with 64P gears was more beneficial than 48P gears to increase precision by having more FDR options to hit that sweet spot to improve efficiency. It would stand to reason that logic would carry forward with servo gears as well. Not saying that larger pitch servo gear would be less efficient, but having a smaller pitch gear could increase the opportunity to offer a wider range of efficiencies, perhaps that might be why AGF servos seem to offer the widest range of torque/speed selection than most other brands on the market right now. To me that's a win/win every which way I see it
Video Clip of Servo Gears with close up view