Originally Posted by nexxus

Then the section head should not have held the meeting, yet he chose to.

Originally Posted by nexxus

I wasn't questioning the validity of the meeting, I merely stated that 'if' none of us had a right to be there as Clive had asserted, you were within your rights to not hold the meeting. I personally didn't have an issue with the meeting taking place and that it was conducted in accordance as it should have been as per the constitution and the governing regulations.