Originally Posted by
condac
I almost forgot. I have tested the 4PX with a S-FHSS reciever R204GF-E
Avg latency is 10.1ms. almost 5ms slower than T-FHSS. And S-FHSS is running the servo update at 147Hz.
Here is S-FHSS with R204GF-E RX in Green and T-FHSS R304SB RX in Blue:
Awesome!!!!! Now we know that the Futaba techs are just as clueless about their products. Lol. So the Fasst rx has more latency, lower frame rate, but higher resolution? The TFhss has less latency, a higher frame rate, less resolution, and drops more packets (thereby increasing its average latency)??
And the Sanwa M12 is just a breath faster than the 4pX with TFhss, but it also has better average latency due to its maxed out frame rate of 384hz