R/C Tech Forums - View Single Post - Trinity SS DQ'd from JC Stock Nationals?
View Single Post
Old 04-28-2015, 08:51 AM
  #97  
RC*PHREAK
Tech Champion
iTrader: (146)
 
RC*PHREAK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,375
Trader Rating: 146 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by hollywood3705
Trinity submitted the motor to roar. It passed roar inspection....the same motor you buy is the same submitted. Roar then changed the rules but grandfathered the d4 ss in. The new rule allows for no varience....so to be truly in line with the rule the intrude nt that measures it must be placed perfectly and calibrated perfectly for no variance. In the real world this does not happen. So it falls on the tech guy to judge based upon the rules we use in the us. And he does what he always does.....plain and simple. He's a motor company that also is a roar tech official who us then hired to run tech at races. What do you think is going to happen? His judgment is what dq'd people not trinity not roar (because it's not an official roar race only). He says that it was under. I think blaming roar completely and blaming trinity is way off base. Maybe.we need to look at who we use for tech. What and who they represent. And maybe just maybe find a outside source to provide tech. We shoot ourselves in the foot over and over in stock by doing this. And until the human element of judgement and or who one likes dislikes who one represents is out of the equation then this back and forth of tech will never end. It has to be a global ruling. It has to be a global standard of tech equipment. the stuff we use has to be consistant. A 100 dollar fluke brand meter is tested by the National fire agency. It's listed to be a gold standard. Use them. Use nice calipers. Whatever it is make it the same across the board
as i understand it, the bold part is not true. yes, ROAR came up with the rule after trinity submitted the SS, but the motors trinity submitted were within the rules they would later come up with. but, what went down with how that rule came about is not clear. for example, if the motors trinity submitted to ROAR were 19.32, 19.31, and 19.30, and ROAR later came up with the 19.3 rule, that doesn't leave a lot of room for manufacturing variance.

Originally Posted by Rick Hohwart
The saddest aspect of this whole situation is that there are racers trying to justify illegal gear. How could R/C racing have sunk so low? Really pathetic.
nah, the saddest part is reps from other motor companies trying to harpoon another company and leaving customers/hobbyists/racers in their wake...
RC*PHREAK is offline