R/C Tech Forums - View Single Post - USGT
Thread: USGT
View Single Post
Old 03-16-2015 | 09:57 AM
  #3555  
Kevin K's Avatar
Kevin K
Tech Champion
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,854
From: In a land of mini-mighty mental giants
Default

Originally Posted by daleepp
Hi Guys;

In sanctioned/organized racing venues (ROAR/EFRA/IFMAR) the maximum width of a 190mm body is actually 195mm and in the 200mm class the bodies are allowed to be 205mm. Most body manufacturers try to be right out there as wide as possible.
In the USGT / GTSpec type classes there are no rules pertaining to width. When we did the LFA body the GT class was still kinda fresh and just starting to gell. I was kinda guessing at what would work best - thus the LFA is a true 200mm body. (guessed wrong....oops) Since then we are trying to do PROTOform GT bodies in a more optimum width, to hopefully satisfy as many USGT fans as possible.

Since the LFA body release it became apparent that a 190/195mm GT body was the way to go, so that's the direction we went. However, I've also noted a bit of a down-side to that width as explained below. So many enthusiasts of this class really dig the realism factor, so in the case of the PFM-10 we intentionally made the front 1mm wider per side and the overall rear width approx 3-4mm wider for a couple reasons.

- in order to have realistic rear fender shapes (with a proper amount of "roll-under" behind the rear wheel openings) it automatically creates a potential "body-tuck" type situation (which we all hate ) By merely adding a few mm in that area we have hopefully created a better compromise between form and function.
- Some GT enthusiasts like the staggered wheel look. Now it's tad easier to emulate the way real 1:1 supercars look with their wider rear wheels. Now 31mm rear wheels can be used if you so chose. (there are tons of them in the rc marketplace)
- From a performance standpoint, thin spacers can now be used to slightly space out the track width and possibly gain a bit of cornering stability.

I hope that helps you understand out logic here at PROTOform. We love this class and are currently hard at work on new USGT styles.

QUESTION: Do you think that we should do a 190mm version of the Lexus LFA? It would have a few updates to the aero package as seen in the real world but would essentially be 90% the same, just narrower.

Thanks for you input and comments! Much apprecuiated.

Dale Epp - PROTOform
Dale...thanks for the info on what and why you did the things you did.

After reading this I now understand the reason behind what you did and why the rear of the body is so wide. To be honest as soon as I was made aware of this it made me question what was going on.

USGT has rules for a spec tire and that spec tire is 24mm in width. The tires can be mounted on 26mm rims if wanted but they perform better on 24mm. As a result there are not very many 24mm rims with alot of offset in them. So if you are running with the spec tires on 24mm wheels then a true 190mm body is what would fit and look the best. Now that being said I have run 200mm bodies with normal 24mm rims and the performance isnt much different.

Spacing out the rear of your car will cause your car to have more steering and with the spacing being off that much it could be an issue...just an FYI

A 190mm LFA would be nice!
Kevin K is offline