R/C Tech Forums - View Single Post - RC Shock Dyno Test Results
View Single Post
Old 03-01-2015 | 12:54 AM
  #4  
cokemaster's Avatar
cokemaster
Tech Adept
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 235
From: Spring, TX
Default

Very nice presentation. A couple of comments:

1. In the section of tapered piston and the % difference between compression and rebound showing up to 5.4% difference. The flat piston results are indicating the same difference, e.g. flat 2 1.7 4.54 also shows 5.4% difference for 400 cSt between comp/reb.
2. Can we also conclude that a greater total hole area is less influenced by temperature changes in the oil?
3. It would be nice to see some test with dual piston design (MIP, VRP, RC Shox).
3. The report does not tell us the accuracy/hysteresis of the shock dyno itself. Is this negligible in these results?

Last edited by cokemaster; 03-01-2015 at 01:10 AM.
cokemaster is offline