R/C Tech Forums - View Single Post - Is iCharger really superior?
View Single Post
Old 07-28-2014, 03:52 PM
  #86  
LasagnaCat
Tech Elite
iTrader: (161)
 
LasagnaCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hickory Hills, IL
Posts: 2,253
Trader Rating: 161 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Jerz616
I have a 6000 pack that I run in mod sedan and its over a year old and has well over 100+ charge/discharges on it and it is still at 1.3 per cell and gets as low as .9 per cell throughout the day depending on how much its ran.
Have you run that pack against a different pack that has a (much) higher IR? If you run a pack that's at .9 per cell, and then run a pack that's 3 per cell (with all other things being equal...) how much time on the clock does that translate to? Tenths, hundredths, thousandths per lap? How much actual time are we chasing in the low IR hunt?

If you can run a heat with a good handling car, not touch or hit ANYthing, and turn a bunch of laps with an average within a tenth or two for your top ten or twenty (or more) laps... is a good pack going to be a night and day difference?

How much would battery condition affect your gearing? The never-ending discussion on race day seems to be FDR... how much would your gearing change (to get the same lap times) on two identical cars if one was running a good pack and other an old tired pack, if at all? Just trying to make this into a tangible measurement somehow, and not just people being OCD over IR and measurements because it's something you CAN measure.
LasagnaCat is offline