Originally Posted by
howardcano
A digression:
Lotus also came up with active suspension systems to keep the ride height constant under varying aerodynamic loads. It had the advantage that there was no extra unsprung weight, as the wings and tunnels were still mounted to the main chassis. Although the main reason for its use was aerodynamics, it also worked much better over bumps than conventional springs and dampers.
I remember watching Senna running down the straight in Detroit, a very rough track. All the normally-suspended cars were bouncing and jostling about, with the driver's head almost a blur. In contrast, the Lotus' wheels were moving wildly up and down, but the chassis glided along like it was a magic carpet, and Senna's helmet was nearly motionless.
Now we return you to the regularly-scheduled thread.
Also F1 is actually talking about allowing active suspension once again. Why? Can you believe as a cost cutting measure? The amount of money being spent to maximize standard passive suspensions in F1 has got so high that the relative simplicity of active systems are now cheaper.