Originally Posted by
Dave H
No experience with that combo, but I doubt it. The idea of binding a receiver to a transmitter is generally to prevent any other transmitter taking control, or interfering.
I agree with you that the idea of binding a receiver to a transmitter is to prevent any other "unbound" transmitter from taking control. The thing that I am not sure about is if the binding could occur with 2 transmitters.
It seems like you could as the receiver is "dumb" in that the memory of the binding is stored in the transmitter and not the receiver. The receiver has an ID that it outputs that is stored in the transmitter that allows the two to communicate.
Once I get my MT-4S I will have to try it to see if it can be done.