Originally Posted by
9turn
Cain I'm not asking you to turn the car or give me advice on the car I want to drive the car I think it is dilled The only thing it does sometimes that I don't like is the Rear end will kick out on a big sweeper But if you stab the gas soon enough there's no problem let me know
no prob. Do you have the M2C rear toe in block, what setup are you running exactly and what conditions are you using the vehicle in?
Originally Posted by
rippen
WC, I have to disagree with you on this one, the RPM arms are way better then the stock AE arms.
+1
Originally Posted by
King DORK
RPM arms are absolutely better than the stock rubber arms and flex much less. Limiters make a difference without a doubt. FT carbon arms would be great, but not likely gonna see AE give this car that kind of love.
+2
Originally Posted by
Wild Cherry
Believe it or not.
Comparing the stiffness of the arms...
Compare a worn out Ae to a brand new RPM and you will find the RPM to be a bit stiffer then the Ae.
Compare both brand new however , they are close almost equel IMO.
Lesson learned ?
Old Rpm or Ae both flex a lot easier then when new.
They both wrap the same from hard hits & hand landings.
Check your arms carefully and replace if you can see they are bent.
Use either brand you like , could care less just informing the differences between both.
By that logic, then by default the RPMs are better as they start out the same as the AE in your opinion (sorry, felt the RPMs were stiffer than the new AE ones I had) and they stay more rigid longer. As far as geometry changes, etc. They may be a different geometry, didn't check, however, did that geometry change make the vehicle handling worse? Personally after trying others who had SC10 4x4s at the time with the stock arms versus the one I had, I didn't notice an advantage one way or the other due to arm geometry.