View Single Post
Old 03-15-2013, 10:07 AM
Rick Vessell
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
Rick Vessell's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mars
Posts: 2,322
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)

Originally Posted by Roelof View Post
I think you are wrong with your calculations... The max speed of the piston is the same as the rotating speed....

The stroke of current .21 engines is about 17mm, 1 round is 53.4mm in distance.
Lets say @46.000 rpm is 766rps. In 1 second it is running 766 x 0.0534 = 41 meter/sec which is 143km/u (no sonic sound)
I can remember a limit for lubrication has a magic number of 35m/s...

V=a x t , a = V/t

t is 1 round /4 (the moment from 0 to max speed) so that is 1/766 and again /4 = 0.326msec

a = 41/0.000326 = 125624 m/s^2

10m/s^2 = 1G so you are talking about 12562.4G

I know a piston+rod is about 7.5 gram so it will create 94kg force @46.000rpm

This is pure theoretic because a 90 degrees travel of the crakshaft is not giving a halfway of the piston travel. A 90 degree exhaust timing is somewhere arround 7mm so there is a 7mm and a 10mm acceleration and not exactly half. And these calculations are in a lineair movement but actually is is more like a sinus shape so actually the 94 kg is a bit higer.

As you can see with such forces manufacturers are searching the limits of the mechanical strength.

By the way, some of the noise of an engine is comming from the cooling head, the vibrating fins can produce some noise....
You are correct, I did those calculations in a hurry last night and forgot to do the last conversion. That gives me a more realistic piston speed of 25.226 m/sec.

I know the fins do resonate. More of the noise anymore is not from the exhaust but the intake, even with INS boxes. Does EFRA still require the 3 chamber mufflers? I remember Frankie doing noise testing at Lostallo at the WC in '09. Didn't see much difference in dB output and the engines ran worse if I remember correctly.
Rick Vessell is offline  
Reply With Quote