R/C Tech Forums - View Single Post - Cost comparison between running Mod and Stock class.
Old 11-03-2012, 01:15 PM
  #6  
UrabusDenis
Tech Master
 
UrabusDenis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Croatia
Posts: 1,008
Default

Originally Posted by JamesL_71
I would argue that, from an equipment standpoint, it is cheaper to run Mod on a competitive/national level than it is to run the slower 17.5 non-timing Stock classes.

In Stock, you have to keep up with the Jones's... best/latest batteries, motors, speedos, etc. The speeds are slow enough that the differences in the electronics from a year ago can be substantial enough to affect your race outcome. In Mod, the cars are typically overpowered to the point that you can be competitive with most off the shelf motors and batts.

In Mod you will obviously go through consumables faster... and you will break a lot more if you cant keep it off the boards...
+1... In Mod batteries are much less important than in blinky stock classes from my experience
UrabusDenis is offline