Originally Posted by
drolmaeye
From a physics point of view springs are not too complex. Has the technology associated with manufacturing and testing really changed that much? Or is it just that rc company (or companies) have a better understanding?
I would like a little more detailed info if you have the time/inclination.
Reminds of the story of the Princess and the Pea. How is that anyone can feel the difference of a set of springs?
I'm not trying to insult anyone who believes in Avids and I agree with all the rave reviews are success stories. My point is that the Avids are simple non-progressive springs as far as I can tell. There is no pre or post tension "technology" in them. Spring materials haven't changed a great deal and even if they did, the modulus of elasticity doesn't change with time. My best guess is that they are made with more precision. More precision in the wire diameter, shape, and length and that's about it. This would result in better corner balance and possibly more consistency.
Jbone,
I assume the rate from AE to Avid is not exactly the same. Is there any possibility that a softer or harder spring can be attributed the increased performance? Again, I'm not trying to start a fight here. This is all food for thought and bench racing!
Respectfully,
Tom