R/C Tech Forums

R/C Tech Forums (https://www.rctech.net/forum/)
-   Onroad Nitro Engine Zone (https://www.rctech.net/forum/onroad-nitro-engine-zone-71/)
-   -   RB 2011 Engine Line-up (https://www.rctech.net/forum/onroad-nitro-engine-zone/477141-rb-2011-engine-line-up.html)

Riketsu 01-31-2011 07:29 AM

RB 2011 Engine Line-up
 
RB has already released the engine lineup for 2011 ahead of the Nuremberg Toy Fair... (www.redrc.net)

http://www.redrc.net/2011/01/rb-prod...ne/#more-39011

http://www.redrc.net/2011/01/rb-prod...ne/#more-39032



What it did seem curious to me, is that they have released a new .12 version, the RS... They say that the new RS comes with a 11.9mm crankshaft. It seemed odd to me, because I thought that Novarossi had reserve the rights to themselves to keep the 11.9mm version to Novarossi alone. I hadn't seen any other Novarossi based engine using the 11.9mm before RB.

JP, JP Gimar, MAX, RB, Capricorn, all of them were using the 11.5mm crankshafts in their engines...

Roelof 01-31-2011 08:38 AM

Money talks......

It is a shame that on yearly base new models have to be showed wile most engines are just equal to older models or do change during the year (timings/materials) without notice.

Riketsu 01-31-2011 09:21 AM


Originally Posted by Roelof (Post 8576552)
Money talks......

It is a shame that on yearly base new models have to be showed wile most engines are just equal to older models or do change during the year (timings/materials) without notice.

They seem to always leave some room for improvement...

For example, RB might have come up with a 11.9mm, but they still have the insulated carb and balanced crankshaft up their sleeve.

Although I heard that the new version of the MM M3 comes with the insulated carb...

Anthony.B 01-31-2011 10:26 AM

Hello from France,
RB just release its new range of engines, including the RB T11 RS.
This winter RB decided to improve her range. The main modification it's the crankshaft (switch to 11.9mm).
This change is not for money, or follow Novarossi ...
Tests have been made this Winter to improve the T10rc, and this configuration was chosen.
T11rs is the new best touring engine from RB, with main improvements, more power at low RPM, and more fiability and easy adjustement.
Pilots will be delighted with the new t11rs !
More to come at the Nuremberg toy fair ... :)

DJ_Shakespear 01-31-2011 05:59 PM

Thats funny - I know for a fact there is also another engine that ISN'T listed there!
It looks exactly like the T10/T11 but instead of having the same logo on the head, there is a picture/map of Australia covering the center and it says M. Russel Tuned. I have seen it in person, but can't find a single bit of information on it.

Mr-s413bt 01-31-2011 06:24 PM

Matt Russell is an Australian/Sydney engine tuner... thats probably why they are not advertised with the RB 2011 lineup

He managed to get an engine in the final at the TC worlds (Phil Woodbury)

Mike 78 01-31-2011 07:32 PM

TG Modified / M. Russell Tuned
 
:)

Michael_T 01-31-2011 09:58 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Photo attached :sneaky:

DJ_Shakespear 02-01-2011 05:26 AM

Jeez, some people can just find this info so easily!
Im very sure those are the very same ones, and Phil Woodbury sounds very familiar.
I pitted directly behind him at the Vics admiring that engine of his!! :D
Too bad I never sat to actually watch it and see how it goes :(

Slo-MTX4 02-01-2011 05:55 AM


Originally Posted by DJ_Shakespear (Post 8581581)
Jeez, some people can just find this info so easily!
Im very sure those are the very same ones, and Phil Woodbury sounds very familiar.
I pitted directly behind him at the Vics admiring that engine of his!! :D
Too bad I never sat to actually watch it and see how it goes :(

Phil wasnt at the Vics mate

GIMAR 02-01-2011 06:24 AM

1 Attachment(s)
also my company,JP-GIMAR go in 11,9 crankshaft
this is the prototype of mine crankshaft.

after Nourberg Toy-Fair I will post the real 11,9 crankshaft that are tuned and
hard coatend from JP and have 2 weight for best balancing.
also the photo of the new 2011 line

thank you in advance

Giovanni Crea
JP-GIMAR

Riketsu 02-01-2011 07:24 AM

So, the TG model is something like a Murnan M3??? :confused::confused:

Riketsu 02-01-2011 07:26 AM


Originally Posted by GIMAR (Post 8581794)
also my company,JP-GIMAR go in 11,9 crankshaft
this is the prototype of mine crankshaft.

after Nourberg Toy-Fair I will post the real 11,9 crankshaft that are tuned and
hard coatend from JP and have 2 weight for best balancing.
also the photo of the new 2011 line

thank you in advance

Giovanni Crea
JP-GIMAR

Thanks for the heads up Giovanni...

I have seen the 11.5mm version run and its really impressive...

Are you going to have a insulated carb and chamber o-ring ??

GIMAR 02-01-2011 07:37 AM

we already have and chamber o-ring,
for the carburator....not have,because we use
another carburator that is modified by JP and it is
3mm lower-

also because we have testing a lot and with isolator
for our test is not really better.
also more novarossi team driver NOT use it-

but if client want,i have 50 in stock and is easy to put inside

thanks

HoboShop 02-01-2011 09:24 AM


Originally Posted by Riketsu (Post 8582016)
So, the TG model is something like a Murnan M3??? :confused::confused:

Murnans rb m3 is the best .12 on the market. It has tons of bottomend and midrange and stupid topend but the part that seperates it from other engines is it still makes runtime easy!!!!

wingracer 02-01-2011 09:27 AM


Originally Posted by Riketsu (Post 8576208)
It seemed odd to me, because I thought that Novarossi had reserve the rights to themselves to keep the 11.9mm version to Novarossi alone.

I don't know about this case but usually it's only for a certain amount of time. For instance, Mugen had exclusive rights to the first rear exhaust .12 for one year. Despite the fact that Nova built it, NO other rear exhaust .12's were made. After a year, Nova, RB and others all came out with one.

Riketsu 02-01-2011 09:33 AM


Originally Posted by wingracer (Post 8582563)
I don't know about this case but usually it's only for a certain amount of time. For instance, Mugen had exclusive rights to the first rear exhaust .12 for one year. Despite the fact that Nova built it, NO other rear exhaust .12's were made. After a year, Nova, RB and others all came out with one.


That makes sense... But since there was a lot of time between the first 11.9mm and the new engines announced with 11.9 (around 4-5 years). I came to think that Novarossi refused to give their 11.9 to other re-brand manufacturers.

HoboShop 02-01-2011 09:34 AM


Originally Posted by GIMAR (Post 8582058)
we already have and chamber o-ring,
for the carburator....not have,because we use
another carburator that is modified by JP and it is
3mm lower-

also because we have testing a lot and with isolator
for our test is not really better.
also more novarossi team driver NOT use it-

but if client want,i have 50 in stock and is easy to put inside

thanks

How does your motors compare to the older jp eagle tl3t in terms of power and how does gimar jp r09 compare to the jp r9 eagle. I had both the r9 was the motor to have In 8 scale tons of topend. The .12 eagle had tons of rpms but it had no bottomend so it felt slower then my Murnan rb and novarossi engines. I would like to now because I need some new .21 engines and I am stuck between the flash special tuned and the jp gimar ro9 fully tuned 14.5mm crank or 14.mm crank? Which motor is faster overall?

Riketsu 02-01-2011 09:37 AM


Originally Posted by HoboShop (Post 8582550)
Murnans rb m3 is the best .12 on the market. It has tons of bottomend and midrange and stupid topend but the part that seperates it from other engines is it still makes runtime easy!!!!

Its funny that every time someone mentions the "m3", someone like you come on with the same comment...

I know the M3 is a good engine, that is not what I meant or used as reference to.

I was asking if the arrangement between "Top Gear" and RB, and Murnan and RB similar. Since its basically the same engine, made to the modder specs with a personalized engine heat sink.

Riketsu 02-01-2011 09:41 AM


Originally Posted by HoboShop (Post 8582596)
How does your motors compare to the older jp eagle tl3t in terms of power and how does gimar jp r09 compare to the jp r9 eagle. I had both the r9 was the motor to have In 8 scale tons of topend. The .12 eagle had tons of rpms but it had no bottomend so it felt slower then my Murnan rb and novarossi engines. I would like to now because I need some new .21 engines and I am stuck between the flash special tuned and the jp gimar ro9 fully tuned 14.5mm crank or 14.mm crank? Which motor is faster overall?

What motor do you think he will say is faster??? His motor or another company's motor?? :lol::lol:

Team Kamikaze 02-01-2011 10:42 AM


Originally Posted by Riketsu (Post 8582631)
What motor do you think he will say is faster??? His motor or another company's motor?? :lol::lol:

Bet you he will say STS http://cdn.calguns.net/calguns.net/c...ilies/nuts.gif :lol:

GIMAR 02-01-2011 11:16 AM

I write only for my brand......as normal.

in 1/8 on road the best is 14,5mm 9ports.
now I put on the market new engines,that is similar
at my old GIMAR r09 but have new light piston and little
changhe inside

in 1/10 class the new 11,9 engines have very very lot bottom power and
middle and good rpm

since 2 year that I create with JP new brand,step by step I do litle changhe to
have more power at low and middle and continue to develop all the trattment and tha accuraty that is inside JP company fro 20years.

v one rrr power 02-01-2011 12:57 PM


Originally Posted by Roelof (Post 8576552)
Money talks......

It is a shame that on yearly base new models have to be showed wile most engines are just equal to older models or do change during the year (timings/materials) without notice.

yeah i agree 100% with you i think that they should make the product as a standard it will remain the same until a new version will be out

DJ_Shakespear 02-02-2011 12:53 AM


Originally Posted by Slo-MTX4 (Post 8581675)
Phil wasnt at the Vics mate

I wasn't implying he was, just saying that the name sounds very familiar to me.

Ahh crap! I see what made u think I was referring to him!
I meant the guy with the TG RB engine pitted directly behind me, and near opposite u, Slo-MTX4 :D , not that I thought he was Phil - I heard his name near the end of the day, but can't remember it now.

Anthony.B 03-25-2011 09:45 AM

1 Attachment(s)
hello drivers,
RB have just release his new manifold called RB 2668 for 2.1 engines.
After tests and comparaison this new manifold improve power at low rpm, and throttle linearity!
Cordially :)

jaykay 07-01-2011 07:39 AM

Has someone tested the new RB Circuit 11 engine?

Grinder 07-01-2011 07:02 PM


Originally Posted by jaykay (Post 9331945)
Has someone tested the new RB Circuit 11 engine?

Yes. It is a very fast engine. :nod:

jaykay 07-04-2011 02:36 PM


Originally Posted by Grinder (Post 9334303)
Yes. It is a very fast engine. :nod:

i have just break in an engine and it seems that it is a very good one.
i only have to put a 0.1mm shim under the chamber, because 2x glow plugs have been damaged after driving.


All times are GMT -7. It is currently 12:33 PM.

Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.