Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro On-Road
Which engine for 1/8 serpent veteq: Novamega Evo 5 or RB Concept C5 >

Which engine for 1/8 serpent veteq: Novamega Evo 5 or RB Concept C5

Which engine for 1/8 serpent veteq: Novamega Evo 5 or RB Concept C5

Old 07-29-2002, 02:11 PM
  #1  
Tech Adept
Thread Starter
 
Spillertwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 249
Default Which engine for 1/8 serpent veteq: Novamega Evo 5 or RB Concept C5

I'm looking into the purchase of a 1/8 serpent veteq or vector and would like your opnion on which engine is beter.
The Novamega or the RB Concept ?

If you have any other suggestions they are welcom as well.

Thanks.
Spillertwo is offline  
Old 08-05-2002, 09:06 PM
  #2  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: sweden
Posts: 9
Default

Check if RBc5 has a slope in the center of the piston indentical to MS evo5 or Picco. The combustion is more concentrated which I think.But RB engines seems to be more reliable.Please also tell me what you find out about these two engines
frankzettel is offline  
Old 08-05-2002, 09:22 PM
  #3  
Tech Apprentice
 
Jack Moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 54
Default

The C-5 is the way to go I just put one in my MRX-3 and it rocks it will blow the EV-5 away no problem mine and the three i have sold to local customers are just ballistic you can find more info here www.rbproducts.com/rbww/engines3.5/indexrb21.htm

www.kustomrc.com
Jack Moss is offline  
Old 08-06-2002, 07:53 AM
  #4  
Tech Adept
 
university_dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Milton Keynes, England
Posts: 187
Default

I have only had experience with one in a 1/8th off road car, but it was noticably faster then the RB WS7. Seems like an absolutely ballistic engine.
university_dave is offline  
Old 08-06-2002, 08:06 AM
  #5  
Tech Addict
 
BallPy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 544
Default

I just put a Siro in one and let me tell you what. That is the biggest pain. There blocks are so rought the Centax wouldnt fit over it. Stay away From Siro.
BallPy is offline  
Old 08-06-2002, 08:38 AM
  #6  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ATLANTA GEORGIA
Posts: 76
Default

Just ran the new evo5 and it was balistic.
Very easy to tune.I would also suggest a MRX3 MUGEN over the serpant I've never driven a car that handles as well as this car out of the box with the set-up they gave.
wtleadfoot is offline  
Old 08-06-2002, 08:58 AM
  #7  
Tech Adept
Thread Starter
 
Spillertwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 249
Default

How long does your evo motor run with one full fuel tank ?

I would like to consider different cars like the MRX3 but availability is a big problem. Only two stores in the vicinity and both only sell Serpent.
Do you have a good online shop for the MRX3 were you can get the car and parts delivered to Europe ?

Thanks
Spillertwo is offline  
Old 08-06-2002, 09:13 AM
  #8  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ATLANTA GEORGIA
Posts: 76
Default

I really could'nt tell you on the parts there in Europe but here there plentiful.
Run time wasn't a problem ,but I was running a 7.5 ventura and made 5 plus min. with 76mm. rear tires.
wtleadfoot is offline  
Old 08-06-2002, 09:17 AM
  #9  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ATLANTA GEORGIA
Posts: 76
Default

Try this place
Winner's circle
http://www.gasrccar.com/
wtleadfoot is offline  
Old 08-06-2002, 09:56 AM
  #10  
Tech Adept
Thread Starter
 
Spillertwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 249
Default

Thanks for the link. I had a look. The mugen does seem to be less expensive.
Do you know what is the difference between the mugen and the serpent vector/veteq ?
How long has the MRX3 been on the market ?
Spillertwo is offline  
Old 08-06-2002, 10:02 AM
  #11  
Tech Addict
 
BallPy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 544
Default

The biggest difference is the suspention. The Veteq has cantileaver suspention which very complex, but once it is set up it is awsome.
BallPy is offline  
Old 08-06-2002, 10:06 AM
  #12  
Tech Adept
Thread Starter
 
Spillertwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 249
Default

Okay that an obvious difference but the vector doesn't have that I think and everybody here in the european championship was running a vector at the last race.
What's the difference between the MRX and the vector ?
I've heard the veteq is a sweet car but very technical and if you crash with the rear train you have to work at it for more than an hour to get it back in to shape. So I'm leaning towards the vector.
What do you think ?
Spillertwo is offline  
Old 08-06-2002, 11:18 AM
  #13  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ATLANTA GEORGIA
Posts: 76
Default

Low center of gravity,parts and kits are cheaper.
Excellent turn in ,You don't have to be aggressive with the Mugen car like the serpant to make it turn.very stable(DID I SAY CHEAPER) but not on quality .Look at what's winning at most of the 1/8 scale events. Yes good drivers but a car that's easy to set-up.
wtleadfoot is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.