Roelof

Anyone played with the flyweights of the new clutch?

I did cut my shoes to leading (I always do) but the new clutch comes with a tailing setting and so far I see there are no leading flyweights optional with original or optional parts. RickV told me that a leading setting does not work well and that is why only tailing is used but so far I have tested I haven't seen any problem.

MRX4XXXX

Hmmmm..

The same parts rotate now to the other direction. My quess is that there will be new parts soon that holes for the pins in both ends.

I am forced to drive 1/12 allready. 1/8 tests have to wait for the spring now.

-X-

tonyhalandri

Does anyone knows if the WC EDITION comes with the new upper front arms?

ralphierace13

iTrader: (5)

yes it does....

SNR Graphite

iTrader: (19)

Hey guys I make a 4mm thick front body mount holder for MRX5.

nitrodash

yes it does I just finish one up a few day ago

Michael_T

iTrader: (52)

Guys,

Do you encounter any issues running larger gear ratio gaps?

Is 16/50 and 20/45 an issue?

I know with some other brands, running a large teeth difference between 1st and 2nd could cause issues (ie. stripping).

It seems to mesh ok.

Thanks,

MugenDrew

iTrader: (36)

No problem what so ever at all. We run 16-20 50-48 47-45 at three of the tracks in Florida.

tonyhalandri

Thanks for the info guys..

GMartinez

iTrader: (91)

+1

GMartinez

iTrader: (91)

I drilled both holes 3mm like i would on the std clutch no issues just felt there was no need to crank the spring down as much as before

Slo-MTX4

iTrader: (1)

Thats the gearing i run most of the time Mr Tohmeh never ever had a drama.

Roelof

So it seems no difference but better for the spring because a lower pre-tension.

RC MARKET

iTrader: (12)

CSO & MUGEN Release New Product for MRX-5

GMartinez

iTrader: (91)

exactly did not feel any difference cranking it down the most difference between the wc & 4x clutch
The Wc does not hit hard like the 4x but the wc launces smoothly when it shifts versus hitting hard like the 4x