S960 v.s. MRX4R but then engine runtime (fuel consumption)
05-09-2007, 03:04 AM
#1
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
S960 v.s. MRX4R but then engine runtime (fuel consumption)
Interesting....
A Serpent/Novarossi sponsored top driver in the Dutch Championship, changed to Serpent 960 this year, while last year he drove MRX4R/Novarossi....
He never managed to reach the 5 minutes with the MRX4, but this year, on the same track with the same engine, he did manage to get 5 minutes with the 960.......
Also last year he qualified 22 laps in 5 minutes, this year he went into the 23rd lap.....
So, or:
- the Novarossi 35+ he used is a bit different then the 35+ from last year (he choose 35+, because his 359 didn't run to his likings),
- the fueltank in the 960 is bigger then the Mugen
- the 960 is such a bad car, you can not corner it full throttle...
Or perhaps the 960 rolls better?....
Has anyone experienced the same?
A Serpent/Novarossi sponsored top driver in the Dutch Championship, changed to Serpent 960 this year, while last year he drove MRX4R/Novarossi....
He never managed to reach the 5 minutes with the MRX4, but this year, on the same track with the same engine, he did manage to get 5 minutes with the 960.......
Also last year he qualified 22 laps in 5 minutes, this year he went into the 23rd lap.....
So, or:
- the Novarossi 35+ he used is a bit different then the 35+ from last year (he choose 35+, because his 359 didn't run to his likings),
- the fueltank in the 960 is bigger then the Mugen
- the 960 is such a bad car, you can not corner it full throttle...
Or perhaps the 960 rolls better?....
Has anyone experienced the same?
Last edited by M7H; 05-09-2007 at 05:51 AM.
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
