R/C Tech Forums

Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road
Hotbodies D817 Nitro thread >

Hotbodies D817 Nitro thread

Register
FAQ
Community
Wiki Posts
Calendar
Today's Posts
Search
Vendor Directory
Like Tree132Likes

Hotbodies D817 Nitro thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2017, 09:36 AM
  #211  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
lilstewie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lincoln, CA
Posts: 354
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default
Originally Posted by Sofa King
Emulsion on 1/8th scale?... cut the center out of a bladder.
Yes, I did this at DNC on my D815 and worked great.
lilstewie is offline  
Reply
Old 05-25-2017, 10:07 AM
  #212  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (11)
 
1evo RRR Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,615
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default
Originally Posted by lilstewie
Yes, I did this at DNC on my D815 and worked great.
What improved over stock??
1evo RRR Driver is offline  
Reply
Old 05-25-2017, 12:03 PM
  #213  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
omarwashington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kenmore, WA
Posts: 1,102
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default
Reason I'm asking is I'm trying to make my shocks as dead as possible. I feel when using bladders, there is usually some very little rebound.
omarwashington is offline  
Reply
Old 05-25-2017, 12:20 PM
  #214  
Tech Master
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,876
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default
With the D815 / 17 style bladders i never get rebound. Try screwing the cap all the way down with the shaft all the way up. Then install the little screw in the cap.
My ST-RR EVO is offline  
Reply
Old 05-25-2017, 02:48 PM
  #215  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
lilstewie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lincoln, CA
Posts: 354
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default
Originally Posted by 1evo RRR Driver
What improved over stock??
They were dead. like dead. All week long, not even a tiny bit of rebound. They seemed to stay more consistent. I have the 17 now, but have not tried it on there. Both standard bellows and cutting the top work well.
lilstewie is offline  
Reply
Old 05-26-2017, 04:47 AM
  #216  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Amishland PA
Posts: 1,418
Default
you just need to watch this video and build them like this EVERY time. shock never changes...

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3...ock-build_auto
slashracer111 and dm.operating like this.
Chad Phillips is offline  
Reply
Old 05-26-2017, 06:34 AM
  #217  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (357)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,495
Trader Rating: 357 (100%+)
Default
Originally Posted by Chad Phillips
you just need to watch this video and build them like this EVERY time. shock never changes...

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3...ock-build_auto
Nice , shock rebuild time
jmoneym is offline  
Reply
Old 05-28-2017, 09:27 AM
  #218  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
omarwashington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kenmore, WA
Posts: 1,102
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default
Currently using the short carbon tower and truggy front shocks and the rear end felt like it had so much rear traction.
Was using 5 5 2 for diff set up, and tried 5 3 2, car felt great with good off power steering for a small technical track.
omarwashington is offline  
Reply
Old 05-28-2017, 10:15 PM
  #219  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (25)
 
slashracer111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Cullman, AL
Posts: 491
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default
If you haven't tried CVDs on the D817 yet and run on lower traction surfaces, try them. The amount of traction the car has with CVDs makes the extra maintenence worth it.
slashracer111 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-01-2017, 01:06 PM
  #220  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 126
Default
Originally Posted by slashracer111
If you haven't tried CVDs on the D817 yet and run on lower traction surfaces, try them. The amount of traction the car has with CVDs makes the extra maintenence worth it.
I was trying something different, I had Mugen universals at the front and CVDs at the rear and the rear end was planted with 5 4 3 diff setup.
gilbertfg is offline  
Reply
Old 06-01-2017, 01:48 PM
  #221  
Tech Master
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,876
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default
Was the upper outer or inner hole removed from the D815 front shock tower to make the D817 tower?
My ST-RR EVO is offline  
Reply
Old 06-01-2017, 02:34 PM
  #222  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 580
Default
Originally Posted by My ST-RR EVO
Was the upper outer or inner hole removed from the D815 front shock tower to make the D817 tower?
Inner.
Eastside777 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-2017, 12:11 AM
  #223  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Sydney
Posts: 160
Default
[QUOTE=My ST-RR EVO;14942287]Was the upper outer or inner hole removed from the D815 front shock tower to make the D817 tower?[/QUO

I read the outer hole was removed.
stanleyw808 likes this.
bretto107 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-2017, 12:58 PM
  #224  
Tech Master
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,876
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default
Jesus
My ST-RR EVO is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-2017, 07:41 PM
  #225  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 580
Default
I stand corrected I compared the 2 and the new tower is smaller as the outer hole is indeed gone.
Eastside777 is offline  
Reply



Advanced Search

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.