Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road
Kyosho Inferno MP9 TKI4 1/8 Buggy Kit >

Kyosho Inferno MP9 TKI4 1/8 Buggy Kit

Like Tree314Likes

Kyosho Inferno MP9 TKI4 1/8 Buggy Kit

    Hide Wikipost
Old 11-05-2018, 09:06 AM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Kyosho Inferno MP9 TKI4 1/8 Buggy Kit
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: 30Tooth
Picked up a TKI3 and want to upgrade to TKI4 ? Here are all the updated parts:

Shocks

IF347-155 1.5X5 Pistons
IF471-01 Front Shock Body
IF470-01 Rear Shock Body
IF470-03BK Shock Adjust Dial
IFW154 Boots
IF346-05C Shock End Set

Wing

IF491BK Wing
IFW460B Wing Mount/Stay

Rear End

IFH006W Wheel
IF490 HUB
IF490-01 Hub Insert
IF492 Shock Pin
IF423HB Rear Arm
IF287 Hard Upper Rod Rear

Front End

IF489 Steering Rod Set
IF488 Knuckles
IF487H Front Arm
IFW458 Hard Lower Pin
IFW425 93MM CVD
IF286 Hard Upper Rod
IF486 Lower Susp Holder
IFW459 Servo Saver (Hard)
IF446B Ackerman Arm
IF426-64.5 Susp Shaft


Other

IF469B Filter
97035LW-13 Clutch Bell
IF453B Body Mount
IFW107GM Hexes
W300910 Washer
IF443B Center Diff Plate
IF444C Tank
IF479B Radio Box
96772 13x16x0.15mm Shim
IF481B Fuel Tank Stay
IFW336GM Wheelnut
IFB008 TKI4 Body
IFD403W TKI4 Decal

---------------------------

Another option if you want TKI4 Durability but TKI3 geometry of the front arm is :

IF493 Front Arm (Updated MP9 front arms replaces IF427B as a direct fit. Left and right.)

They use the older TKI3 captured outer hinge pin and screw. But if you just reem out the the outer hole you can use TKI hinge-pin/nut (IFW458)
---------------------------

Optional Updates / New Parts:

IFW469 IFW469 Aeration Cap Set(Threaded Big Shock/MP9)

IFW473 New Brake Pads (Sept 2017)

Optional Alu front hubs:
- IFW412 - 13 deg (like stock plastic ones)
- IFW436 - 16 deg
- IFW474 - 17.5 deg
- IFW461 - 19deg

M2C 1mm engine spacer: M2C9610

Body Options
New Bitty Force Body

Tebo's Build Videos

Video #1

Video #2

Video #3

Video #4

Video #5

Video #6

Original Kyosho MP9 TKI Thread
_____________________

Baseline setups from Joonas.




_____________________

Shock build with vented cap and compensator.

You have to use the HC diaphragms (if346-09,stock TKI3 and if not mistaken TKI4 too, yes the thin ones no one likes), aeration caps without the bleeder screw or mod the stock caps by drilling a 1.5 or 2mm hole on the top facing up or at an angle (doesn't matter the size or angle, it just for bleeding pressure behind the diaphragm and allow the foam compensator to breathe) and a 10mm width x 3.5mm height dome shaped foam compensator made from old open cell inserts or dishwasher sponge. The foam compensator has to be soft enough not to add rebound but allow the diaphragm to regain it's shape.

Setup Sheet and Tuning

The setup sheet is getting crowded with all options but don't worry once you get acquainted with the parts will make sense.
Run the car as is, more than probably you won't need anything else. Using my setup as an example:

Diff gear has two options, normal and LSD. LSD stands for limited slip differential and is like using thick oils because you can't tune coast from locked.

Shock setup is a bit more confusing, you have two shock body sizes (S and M and truggy sized rear shocks that only the first version had so forget this one), three types of pistons (flat holes and surfaces, flat holes tapered surface and tapered holes with tapered surface): tapered have most pack, then black(simple piston) and then white because length of the holes. Then you have different length springs to account for different shock sizes, for a standard wheelbase/no weights car a good combo is Light Blue front and Orange rear, if you extend the wheelbase then I expect the included Light Blue rear springs be money instead of Orange.

Ride height is self explanatory, start always with lower arms parallel because good suspension geometry will be far easier to achieve. Rebound is used as total shock length no idea why they call it rebound, either use total shock length or maximum exposed shock shaft length. Camber self explanatory, run more camber in the front than the rear to make the car oversteer and more rear than front to make it understeer(grossly oversimplified).

Toe same deal as camber(again grossly oversimplified) but this you have to run the least amount you can. I use around 2-2.5 on my cars, never more as I can find traction by other means with way less impact on performance.

Wheelbase is a powerful setting, changes a lot of stuff. Let's just say that it can make the car behave neutral or not in that small range. Try for yourself. I like to use the longest setting and tune from there.

Shock position self explanatory, something most don't change and I don't play around with it. I do have a method but involves much work (with the car bottomed out, see which position places the shock 90 to the lower arm and then chose spring from a couple equations and bam done, I can do it easily so anyone interested just ask.

Rear upper arm position is again an important setting, you change both camber gain and roll centre. The rear roll centre should be higher than the front, that's why I use the middle hole inner row as a starting setup.

Suspension arm, self explanatory: there are two different length arms and each has a hard and a normal flex plastic.

Front suspension bushing is for upper arm alignment, also same deal as rear upper arm position changes both camber gain and roll centre.

Suspension holder is for kick up (pro dive is the correct naming). I believe tki4 9 of kick up to be better than 9 of kick up using the tki3 parts because you can run the car lower (26mm front ride height) and use the +2mm front shock tower if there's too much camber gain or it's stiff in roll. So use +2mm lowered roll centre to keep most stuff unchanged or use the bushings with the dot up to lower the roll centre a bit more, doesn't hurt anything.

Front hub carrier, self explanatory. I am trying to use the out hole on top of the carrier as it is better during braking and accelerating. Together with the higher front roll centre on the tki4 should provide enough camber gain during cornering if not then more caster will do.

Rear roll centre and anti squat(wrongly called skid angle). Again same thinking as the front, lower the car and keep roll centre in the same height as before(that will need a change in upper arm position which my setup does). Anti squat is changed only if the pitching motion causes too much camber to be gained by the rear tires on power, nothing more.

Front knuckle, apparently there's a difference in the Ackerman arm. Can't say anything about them as I don't know enough about both.

Rear hub carrier,there is one made of plastic (which doesn't have offset apparently so it's suited to long arm setting) and three aluminium versions. One similar to the plastic one, other with offset and a new one with offset and adjustable hub height.

Rear tread can be used as arm length and outboard toe(never seen it being used but the possibility is there). Longer is better most of the time (only on really low traction).

Chassis brace, wheel hub, sway bars and weight are self explanatory. No need to use weights nor other hubs. A couple of roll bars would be a nice addition. About the aluminium braces I am torn, I guess the car doesn't need flex with this setup but won't recommend the stiffer braces but the lower engine mount is very nice to deal with flex around the clutch.

Wing and wing stay are like the d81x had regarding height and position. The wing should be as low and have free airflow as possible.

Print Wikipost

Old 11-23-2016, 01:52 PM
  #961  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 148
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by tobamiester
Yes I ran the LFR MP9 body on my TKI3 and no reason why it won't fit on the TKI4, nothing has really changed as far as the chassis layout goes.
Thanks man. Just making sure before I order one and send it to the painter.
450rdawg is offline  
Old 11-23-2016, 02:05 PM
  #962  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 101
Default Fuel line routing?

In the lastest video of jared tebo i noticed he doesnt run the fuel filter because it allows air according to him?
Rafa_kyosho is offline  
Old 11-24-2016, 03:29 AM
  #963  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 165
Default

What's front shock stay..is best to use in the tki4.. HS or H-MS
WavyEnzo is offline  
Old 11-24-2016, 07:41 AM
  #964  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (359)
 
tobamiester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tea drinking Limmey in NJ
Posts: 12,334
Trader Rating: 359 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by WavyEnzo
What's front shock stay..is best to use in the tki4.. HS or H-MS
There isn't a 'best' solution, its based on track conditions. Run whats in the kit and go from there..
tobamiester is offline  
Old 11-24-2016, 05:05 PM
  #965  
Tech Regular
 
Arctic RC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: South of Sweden
Posts: 368
Default

Originally Posted by tobamiester
There isn't a 'best' solution, its based on track conditions. Run whats in the kit and go from there..
I agree but I think the tuning Windows is bigger with the MS package due to the shocks.

Stock package are good if the track is really smooth without any bumps and when the track is high grip.

H-MS package give you more options regarding front roll center that's about it.

I use MS package everywhere and change between MS and H-MS depending of track conditions.

Just what I think if it.
Is it worth it? You need to see for your self. Start with stock and go from there.
Arctic RC is offline  
Old 11-24-2016, 10:32 PM
  #966  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 37
Default

Anyone has a list of all the option parts used in Tebo's worlds replica build?
Qrio is offline  
Old 11-25-2016, 12:23 AM
  #967  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 165
Default

Originally Posted by Arctic RC
I agree but I think the tuning Windows is bigger with the MS package due to the shocks.

Stock package are good if the track is really smooth without any bumps and when the track is high grip.

H-MS package give you more options regarding front roll center that's about it.

I use MS package everywhere and change between MS and H-MS depending of track conditions.

Just what I think if it.
Is it worth it? You need to see for your self. Start with stock and go from there.
Thanks you.. that information really did help me, get a good understanding👌
WavyEnzo is offline  
Old 11-25-2016, 06:09 PM
  #968  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (359)
 
tobamiester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tea drinking Limmey in NJ
Posts: 12,334
Trader Rating: 359 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Arctic RC
I agree but I think the tuning Windows is bigger with the MS package due to the shocks.

Stock package are good if the track is really smooth without any bumps and when the track is high grip.

H-MS package give you more options regarding front roll center that's about it.

I use MS package everywhere and change between MS and H-MS depending of track conditions.

Just what I think if it.
Is it worth it? You need to see for your self. Start with stock and go from there.
Yeah good info. I wrote up some notes on the new parts as it was pretty confusing and not really documented anywhere.

Kyosho's Corp's website describes the towers IFW464 and IFW465

Interestingly, from Tebo's Facebook Live videos posted this past week, he ran the S-Type IFW464 at the Worlds with stock shocks. I was surprised but I think he just wanted the feel of the upper mount being raised 2+mm without the different feel of the longer shock (you need to run with the MS).
tobamiester is offline  
Old 11-25-2016, 06:50 PM
  #969  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
HaulinBass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: grande prairie alberta canada
Posts: 3,096
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Rafa_kyosho
In the lastest video of jared tebo i noticed he doesnt run the fuel filter because it allows air according to him?
that why i dont run them
HaulinBass is offline  
Old 11-25-2016, 09:28 PM
  #970  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (89)
 
Motorman007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,420
Trader Rating: 89 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by tobamiester
Yeah good info. I wrote up some notes on the new parts as it was pretty confusing and not really documented anywhere.

Kyosho's Corp's website describes the towers IFW464 and IFW465

Interestingly, from Tebo's Facebook Live videos posted this past week, he ran the S-Type IFW464 at the Worlds with stock shocks. I was surprised but I think he just wanted the feel of the upper mount being raised 2+mm without the different feel of the longer shock (you need to run with the MS).
He also said Kyosho wants him to run the Opt parts too. After hearing that it Could be marketing so we buy the opt parts.. Something to think about...
Motorman007 is offline  
Old 11-25-2016, 09:36 PM
  #971  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (359)
 
tobamiester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tea drinking Limmey in NJ
Posts: 12,334
Trader Rating: 359 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Motorman007
He also said Kyosho wants him to run the Opt parts too. After hearing that it Could be marketing so we buy the opt parts.. Something to think about...
True, but I'm pretty confident he ran the new Tower at the worlds. Body Off pics from RedRC showed the new tower on his car (not on Boots).
tobamiester is offline  
Old 11-26-2016, 08:56 AM
  #972  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (11)
 
1evo RRR Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,613
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by tobamiester
True, but I'm pretty confident he ran the new Tower at the worlds. Body Off pics from RedRC showed the new tower on his car (not on Boots).

Y'all got to remember, they did a lot !!!! Of running at the worlds So I'm sure they all tried all of those parts at one time or another! During the event, The more important fact is what part gave the best results n did that part make it to the Amain car!
1evo RRR Driver is offline  
Old 11-26-2016, 07:46 PM
  #973  
Tech Master
iTrader: (42)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,121
Trader Rating: 42 (98%+)
Default

i asked him the question during the build....his reply was he prefers the kit tower and shocks......and has been going back and forth with the tki3 and tki4 kick up. towers and shocks for "HIM" arent that big of a deal but for the rest of us i would suggest using them. I have used the MS tower since it first came out and have not gone back since...even built my TKI4 with the MS
RockStar_199 is offline  
Old 11-27-2016, 07:12 PM
  #974  
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 1,062
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by RockStar_199
i asked him the question during the build....his reply was he prefers the kit tower and shocks......and has been going back and forth with the tki3 and tki4 kick up. towers and shocks for "HIM" arent that big of a deal but for the rest of us i would suggest using them. I have used the MS tower since it first came out and have not gone back since...even built my TKI4 with the MS
There is already plenty of down travel with the short shocks. What advantage is there to the MS?
windellmc is offline  
Old 11-27-2016, 08:44 PM
  #975  
Tech Master
iTrader: (46)
 
mourinho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,003
Trader Rating: 46 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by windellmc
There is already plenty of down travel with the short shocks. What advantage is there to the MS?
the short shocks are fine, its just that on real loose and/or bumpy tracks the MS shock/tower combo feels better, the added down/up stroke is beneficial particularly in whoops and long sweeping corners where the car stays more composed. thats my experience anyway
mourinho is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.