Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road
1/8 buggy pivotball vs. kingpin advantage? >

1/8 buggy pivotball vs. kingpin advantage?

1/8 buggy pivotball vs. kingpin advantage?

Old 02-12-2012, 02:48 PM
  #1  
Tech Adept
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 109
Default 1/8 buggy pivotball vs. kingpin advantage?

I'd like to know what everyones opinion is on pivotball vs. kingpin. I just got an MBX 6, my first pivotball car since my on-road days. I've had kyosho, X ray, hotbodies, and most recently The car. So lets hear it.
jmpn02 is offline  
Old 02-12-2012, 07:13 PM
  #2  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
hustler777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: indawoods, WI
Posts: 1,109
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

ummmm.......do you mean "pillow ball"? "pivot ball" is what comes on the TTR EB4 S2...or am i the one who's mistaken? anyway....i've always felt that the pillow ball setup really shines in the ruff stuff and the kingpin setup reacts quicker on the more technical stuff....but it could be just me and my driving style....
hustler777 is offline  
Old 02-12-2012, 08:27 PM
  #3  
Tech Elite
 
hakmazter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,468
Default

Pillowball is definitely better in rough situations and is usually less prone to breakage if you use the correct lower arms (that is the weak point in Mugen and Caster)

Kingpin / C hub are a good design also, but personally I do not see any advantage because our cars can out turn most cars out there. Our new 1/10 is switched over to C-hub since it appears to be more "modern" and with enough work, they handle good also. But of course, making everything aluminum automatically makes things much more durable.
hakmazter is offline  
Old 02-12-2012, 10:15 PM
  #4  
Tech Adept
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 109
Default

Pivot or pillow i have heard it called both so whatever you prefer. Better rough track handling.... I like that. Everyone told me my last car did not look very good in the rough stuff, I have to agree. So far, I really like the Mugen.
jmpn02 is offline  
Old 02-12-2012, 10:39 PM
  #5  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (84)
 
Davidka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,733
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

This question comes up every 6 months or so. A pillow ball setup's key difference from a C-hub setup is this:

Pivot ball allows for variable caster (called "reactive caster"). You can set up the suspension so that the upper and lower inner hinge pins are not parallel so that as the suspension compresses, the caster changes. Mugens have traditionally had a falling caster setup, ie. as suspension compresses, the caster angle decreases. This is supposed to allow for more caster when the suspension is extended for more stability and on-power steering, less caster when compressed for more turn-in.

Because the hub rotates somewhat, a degree of bump steer in unavoidable. The "bump-out" that Mugens are known for is meant to help the car gather itself on crooked jump landings. It seems to work.
Davidka is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.