RB WS9 or Novarossi 21-5k ??
#1
RB WS9 or Novarossi 21-5k ??
I hate to ask but I have ran RB's for the last 5 years and love'em, but need a new engine and I am looking at a Houston modded 21-5K and the new RBWS9
It's going into a MBX6.
Again I hate these this one vs that one threads just looking for some un-bias help, Thanks Joe
It's going into a MBX6.
Again I hate these this one vs that one threads just looking for some un-bias help, Thanks Joe
#2
when i read your thread title i was all ws9 for sure. then reading a houston mod 21-5k i leaned that way...either are great choice. if the novarossi was modded for efficiency id jump that way also considering support from houston. thats a tuff choice you got there good luck with it
#3
id get as many details from houston as possible. considering you know how the sw9 is going to act youll be able to weigh which engine is correct for your style
#8
From a general perspective, I've owned both RB and am now running Nova. For as long as Nova's are available I will never think twice about buying them, much better engines
#10
#11
I got the 21-5K on order with the R2R break-in, and some mods to try and get some more runtime. Now I am wondering if I want to get a turbo head done up for it??? Any ideals?
I have heard the standard plug version has a very smooth, electric like feel to the power band and the turbo one is more of a handful to drive.
I have heard the standard plug version has a very smooth, electric like feel to the power band and the turbo one is more of a handful to drive.
#12
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
I got the 21-5K on order with the R2R break-in, and some mods to try and get some more runtime. Now I am wondering if I want to get a turbo head done up for it??? Any ideals?
I have heard the standard plug version has a very smooth, electric like feel to the power band and the turbo one is more of a handful to drive.
I have heard the standard plug version has a very smooth, electric like feel to the power band and the turbo one is more of a handful to drive.
#13
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
ofna 063 is one of the very best pipes i have ran on the 21-5k , i still also stand by my other pipe choices = dynamite 086hs (novarossi 9886/41021or41020 for a little more low end grunt) , ofna 053 (novarossi 9853/41005)
the low end based pipes have much better mileage with a sacrifice of a little top end screaming power which is where your fuel gets expelled the most .
#14
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
not very good mileage though
ofna 063 is one of the very best pipes i have ran on the 21-5k , i still also stand by my other pipe choices = dynamite 086hs (novarossi 9886/41021or41020 for a little more low end grunt) , ofna 053 (novarossi 9853/41005)
the low end based pipes have much better mileage with a sacrifice of a little top end screaming power which is where your fuel gets expelled the most .
ofna 063 is one of the very best pipes i have ran on the 21-5k , i still also stand by my other pipe choices = dynamite 086hs (novarossi 9886/41021or41020 for a little more low end grunt) , ofna 053 (novarossi 9853/41005)
the low end based pipes have much better mileage with a sacrifice of a little top end screaming power which is where your fuel gets expelled the most .
I haven't personally run the 2013, so I don't know about milage. I was just going by observation of my buddies that run them. Plus they have "that sound".