Jammin Pipes??
#2
i run JP3 everywhere...
JP2 might take away some of your bottom end
JP2 might take away some of your bottom end
#4
I've seen the 1 and 2 run on various engines....
For the most part, 1 gives crazy bottom end; 2 just swaps ends of the spectrum.
3 gives a great all around feel, gets better mileage and has a strong midrange.
I've run it on an EVO-3 Picco for the most part, but it has a similar feel on most Nova's as well.
If I had to pick one again, I'd def. go with the 3. I wouldn't expect too much for mileage out of any of them if that's your ultimate goal.
For the most part, 1 gives crazy bottom end; 2 just swaps ends of the spectrum.
3 gives a great all around feel, gets better mileage and has a strong midrange.
I've run it on an EVO-3 Picco for the most part, but it has a similar feel on most Nova's as well.
If I had to pick one again, I'd def. go with the 3. I wouldn't expect too much for mileage out of any of them if that's your ultimate goal.
#5
what about the 4?
#6
Tech Adept
#10
Tech Adept
jp3 best of the jp pipes
#12
jp3 best on truggy gives alot of bottom end and good mid to top.
if you are running buggy would run jp4 has a little less bottom and alot of mi to top alot
as for vspec when running that you should only use os 2050 pipe if want the full potential of the runtime and smooth power jp3 works with it but in a buggy it has way to much bottom end for a mid sized track will be all over the place out of turns jp4 would be better but os 2050 the best for vspec
if you are running buggy would run jp4 has a little less bottom and alot of mi to top alot
as for vspec when running that you should only use os 2050 pipe if want the full potential of the runtime and smooth power jp3 works with it but in a buggy it has way to much bottom end for a mid sized track will be all over the place out of turns jp4 would be better but os 2050 the best for vspec
#13
Tech Adept
#15
I have a picco p7r evo 2 what pipe works best on it, at a medium track.?