FSEARA Race#2 , October 28, 2012 MB Racing , Daytona
#16
Points and Results from Race #1 have been posted on the other thread.
As far as seeding the heats by points, finishing order, etc......... You guys are killing me on this. This was discussed in length at Kissimmee and it was decided NOT to do so. I do what was decided and I hear grief. I volunteered to take the time and go through the process of seeding every racer which takes quite a long time to set up, and it was ultimately decided not to do it that way. For Race #2 I WILL STACK THE HEATS.
Tim
As far as seeding the heats by points, finishing order, etc......... You guys are killing me on this. This was discussed in length at Kissimmee and it was decided NOT to do so. I do what was decided and I hear grief. I volunteered to take the time and go through the process of seeding every racer which takes quite a long time to set up, and it was ultimately decided not to do it that way. For Race #2 I WILL STACK THE HEATS.
Tim
#20
#21
Regional Moderator
iTrader: (3)
We can discuss it more at the driver's meeting in Daytona. I'm not opposed to making tweaks if they are productive and most are in agreemnent.
Troy, there's a difference in just complaining and seeing an issue and having an opinion or offering constructive criticism. While I might like to offer the "kick in the junk" option, I don't want to have to wear a cup all the time!
In my opinion, we won't see anywhere near the banging at Daytona...a larger track and starting grid will help, regardless of how the quals are seeded or the when the resort done.
Troy, there's a difference in just complaining and seeing an issue and having an opinion or offering constructive criticism. While I might like to offer the "kick in the junk" option, I don't want to have to wear a cup all the time!
In my opinion, we won't see anywhere near the banging at Daytona...a larger track and starting grid will help, regardless of how the quals are seeded or the when the resort done.
#24
Tech Addict
Robert who?
#26
Tech Fanatic