Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree60Likes

VBC D10

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2017, 01:52 AM
  #76  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (29)
 
R3VoLuTiOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,771
Trader Rating: 29 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNERODease
Extra front end weight? Isn't the front end even lighter on the D10? That's what the promo video said.
Not sure what the weight difference is.

I missed a detail of running a full sized front servo right now as extra weight. Car at 1389 outperformed my D09 at 1360ish
R3VoLuTiOn is offline  
Old 11-20-2017, 09:41 AM
  #77  
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Chatham Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,023
Default

I have fondled my brothers new D10 quite a bit during his build - no slop anywhere. As others have mentioned - the new front end is really impressive. The spool out drive issue was fixed in his kit, we did have to shorten the inner hinge pins a smidge, wrong spur but we had to change size anyway. One rear drive shaft blade was a bit tight but a quick sand and it was perfect. So the kit isn't perfect - yet anyway, but wow what a serious racing machine this thing is! I guess with so many parts with super close tolerances you have to expect a little hand fitting - no show stoppers however. I'm still in awe of the car's lack of slop!
*SBH* likes this.
DavidNERODease is offline  
Old 11-20-2017, 03:33 PM
  #78  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7,762
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

A very tight car will be very precise and controllable, but might be slow if the drivetrain bearings, etc, fit too tight in the hubs. A few racedays might be necessary to improve speed, but you can always strap in a 3.5t motor and take it for a spin to loosen things up a bit....
PS: I know plastic blades are hot now, but I always felt that they broke too easily, causing lots of DNF's, specially in the Destiny tc's even with great drivers....
bertrandsv87 is offline  
Old 11-21-2017, 08:43 AM
  #79  
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Chatham Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,023
Default

The bearings in the rear hubs seem hard to install but if you use the rear axle to align the bearings (as someone mentioned) and press them in straight - it's easy. No bearings are binding on my brother's car. We've never used blades with a spool before so we'll see.
DavidNERODease is offline  
Old 11-21-2017, 10:33 AM
  #80  
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
tbrymer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,555
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Is there an ARS (Active Rear Toe) system for the D10? If not are there plans to make one?
tbrymer is offline  
Old 11-21-2017, 11:20 AM
  #81  
Tech Rookie
 
charlie63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Italy - Milan
Posts: 17
Default

Hi guys, someone has already used the car on the track ? Is the car better that the D09 ?
thanks in advance.
charlie63 is offline  
Old 11-21-2017, 11:28 AM
  #82  
Tech Master
iTrader: (12)
 
Professor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sydney,Australia
Posts: 1,181
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by tbrymer
Is there an ARS (Active Rear Toe) system for the D10? If not are there plans to make one?
There is an ars system being tested here in aus at the moment so we should see it available very soon
tbrymer likes this.
Professor is offline  
Old 11-21-2017, 11:29 AM
  #83  
DBM
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Saskatoon, Canada
Posts: 911
Default

Originally Posted by charlie63
Hi guys, someone has already used the car on the track ? Is the car better that the D09 ?
thanks in advance.
I was competitive with Gary Lanzer when he was running his d09. His lap times have gotten much faster with his D10. D10 also looks easier to drive....very smooth with good corner speed.
DBM is offline  
Old 11-24-2017, 03:39 AM
  #84  
Tech Master
 
patorz31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Edmonton Ab
Posts: 1,554
Default

....

Last edited by patorz31; 11-24-2017 at 03:40 AM. Reason: Wrong thread
patorz31 is offline  
Old 11-26-2017, 02:17 AM
  #85  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (29)
 
R3VoLuTiOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,771
Trader Rating: 29 (100%+)
Default

happy the new setup sheet is out.

here you go: https://document.li/08h9

Based off of Lucas' D09 setup and tweaks I've been running on my D09.

Carbon knuckle extension is below the mount instead of ontop, and I've flipped the knuckle mount as well.

Tire sidewalls glued to 59.5 on CRC Black for easy predictable handling. Dual Rate around 70%
R3VoLuTiOn is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 09:19 PM
  #86  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Billy Kelly
Thanks. I'll be looking more into it. I almost bought a used Evo Ghost over summer. But wasn't sure about it. I kinda like running different from the rest of the group I raced with.

I ran the d08 and d09 and they are great cars i can just imagine the d10 vbc racing got something good going
Carloslopez520 is offline  
Old 12-05-2017, 04:51 AM
  #87  
Tech Regular
 
NuttsnBolts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 433
Default

Finished my build!!! Now time for setup and a good old race on Friday night.
(finally finished my work project and I'm on leave, so plenty of time to sort things out for the first race in 2 months)

So my extra parts came in during the week prior and I've been slowly adding them in. Pics are below, but I opted for the battery tape option rather than the newer tabs. When I had the tabs set up I was running about 6.5mm of spacers on top of them to reach the height of my battery. It just felt a little too tall and went with the older option. I was also able to reduce the battery forward and back slop as well, which was bothering me immensely.

On the topic of slop, I had to make a few adjustments. The carbon fibre against the center pulley was rubbing the pulley itself, so I had to file about 'half a square' back. I believe this is because I am using an Arrowmax spur and it feels a little wider than the Kawada design stuff. Swapped out the button head screws for some flat heads in order to keep the whole unit as narrow as possible. May have to check it after a few runs, but there's now only a quarter mil between the pulley and the deck. In all honesty, a slightly wider gap between the two sides wouldn't hurt.


Next onto the front. As you can see I have the battery mount added in there too and the gap between the battery and the steering rack is now a millimeter rather than a hairline. I also swapped out the button head screws on the steering arms for some flat heads and spacers in order to allow me to insert a shin between the washer and the bearing below. Not much, but I noticed some movement in there and it was an easy fix.

You can also see the 8mm ball screw and lock nuts on the steering. This is going to be a huge recommendation as that one race you do not check that joint will be the one race that it comes apart.



Yokomo battery tape—best way to prevent a battery flying out when not using stops. Caps for the speedy under the top deck so I have room to place my receiver and transponder in their current position. Yeah Racing fan mount so I can easily access the center pulley screw as the V brace does not allow for the VBC brand fan mount to fit.


All in all its a decent car with a few quirks and unique challenges. I saw I was quoted on Petitrc along with Tyree Phillips, so I'm glad my experience can be shared in order to help others build their car as easily as possible. So thanks to whomever did that.

Might get some better photos when it's all set up with my shell and stuff.
*SBH* likes this.
NuttsnBolts is offline  
Old 12-05-2017, 09:57 AM
  #88  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnny Wishbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,762
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

If your going to use the CFC option with the car, which is highly recommended, your caps are going to be in the way.
*SBH* likes this.
Johnny Wishbone is offline  
Old 12-05-2017, 02:11 PM
  #89  
Tech Regular
 
NuttsnBolts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 433
Default

Originally Posted by Johnny Wishbone
If your going to use the CFC option with the car, which is highly recommended, your caps are going to be in the way.
Chances are that I won't be using either option as we race on a concrete slab that occasionally gets dusty, so it's really low traction. Both options were listed as medium traction or above so I figured I could replace the bar with the caps instead.
NuttsnBolts is offline  
Old 12-05-2017, 02:22 PM
  #90  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnny Wishbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,762
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by NuttsnBolts
Chances are that I won't be using either option as we race on a concrete slab that occasionally gets dusty, so it's really low traction. Both options were listed as medium traction or above so I figured I could replace the bar with the caps instead.
If your trying to get the car to turn it may be what your looking for, something to consider for testing. I'd use the graphite bars, that way you can probably squeeze the caps between it and the top deck.
Johnny Wishbone is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.