Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Roche Rapide P10W 1/10 235mm Competition Pan Car Kit >

Roche Rapide P10W 1/10 235mm Competition Pan Car Kit

Like Tree55Likes

Roche Rapide P10W 1/10 235mm Competition Pan Car Kit

Reply

Old 07-18-2017, 06:49 AM
  #61  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (27)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 8,906
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default

These are just more xenon plastic.. a great update
jetnjme and pphaneuf like this.
hanulec is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2017, 11:30 AM
  #62  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 17
Default

Guys there are a few of us in Fresno that have 235mm pan cars we started playing with. I have the Roche Rapide P10W as well. Beautiful and fast car. We started running 13.5 2 cell blinky but no organized class yet at our club. What is happening on the west coast northern Cal area for this class? Any discussion on this topic?
Taz_S and pphaneuf like this.
bdw11 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2017, 01:47 PM
  #63  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Taz_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Rosa CA
Posts: 2,597
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by bdw11 View Post
Guys there are a few of us in Fresno that have 235mm pan cars we started playing with. I have the Roche Rapide P10W as well. Beautiful and fast car. We started running 13.5 2 cell blinky but no organized class yet at our club. What is happening on the west coast northern Cal area for this class? Any discussion on this topic?
hope soon once i get stuff organizes and can get one together.

http://www.rctech.net/forum/electric...iscussion.html
THEBIGBULL, bdw11 and pphaneuf like this.
Taz_S is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2017, 04:48 AM
  #64  
Tech Addict
 
pphaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 508
Default

Originally Posted by Taz_S View Post
hope soon once i get stuff organizes and can get one together.

http://www.rctech.net/forum/electric...iscussion.html
If you're looking at organising some Pro10 races, you might be interested in this round-up of Pro10 rules around the world I did, for inspiration, and maybe the simple set of rules I came up with for here based on that round-up.
pphaneuf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 08:15 AM
  #65  
Tech Addict
 
pphaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 508
Default

Finally got my act together, and got my P10W on the track...

I unfortunately snapped off both front body posts, in rather mild crashes? Seems like they are a good deal more brittle than XRay or Associated equivalent, comparing the plastics...

Which leads me to a running issue I've been having with various Roche kits: what the heck is going on with the part numbers?!?

These body posts, for example, exist under (at least?) THREE different part numbers: C40015 (from the manual, but doesn't turn up anything on the Roche website search), ROC-240014 (not in the manual, but does come up on their search, at least), and OPT-0073 (which I believe is the Xenon part number?).

That makes it kind of difficult to source replacements/spare parts!
pphaneuf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 02:23 PM
  #66  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (27)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 8,906
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by pphaneuf View Post
Finally got my act together, and got my P10W on the track...

I unfortunately snapped off both front body posts, in rather mild crashes? Seems like they are a good deal more brittle than XRay or Associated equivalent, comparing the plastics...

Which leads me to a running issue I've been having with various Roche kits: what the heck is going on with the part numbers?!?

These body posts, for example, exist under (at least?) THREE different part numbers: C40015 (from the manual, but doesn't turn up anything on the Roche website search), ROC-240014 (not in the manual, but does come up on their search, at least), and OPT-0073 (which I believe is the Xenon part number?).

That makes it kind of difficult to source replacements/spare parts!
agreed -- but at the back of the manual there is a magical decoder matrix for these part #
hanulec is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2017, 02:37 AM
  #67  
Tech Addict
 
pphaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 508
Default

Originally Posted by hanulec View Post
agreed -- but at the back of the manual there is a magical decoder matrix for these part #
Is that on a separate sheet? I'm using the PDF version of the manual, most of the time, it doesn't have that matrix... I'll dig up the paper one that came with the car when I have a chance, thanks!
pphaneuf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2017, 02:40 AM
  #68  
Tech Addict
 
pphaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 508
Default

Different question: I'm currently running a 2S stick battery (full size), but I'm thinking of switching to shorty batteries. The manual says that transverse gives more neutral handling, with less steering response, for low traction surfaces.

I assume inline is generally "more steering response, for higher traction surfaces", but what's the difference like between forward and rearward battery positioning?

Thanks in advance!
pphaneuf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2017, 04:22 AM
  #69  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (27)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 8,906
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by pphaneuf View Post
Is that on a separate sheet? I'm using the PDF version of the manual, most of the time, it doesn't have that matrix... I'll dig up the paper one that came with the car when I have a chance, thanks!
guess the 1/12 manuals are a bit different. ill speak w/ Max about this
pphaneuf likes this.
hanulec is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2017, 07:50 AM
  #70  
Tech Fanatic
 
daleburr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 917
Default

Originally Posted by pphaneuf View Post
Different question: I'm currently running a 2S stick battery (full size), but I'm thinking of switching to shorty batteries. The manual says that transverse gives more neutral handling, with less steering response, for low traction surfaces.

I assume inline is generally "more steering response, for higher traction surfaces", but what's the difference like between forward and rearward battery positioning?

Thanks in advance!
A more rearward weight distribution will give more traction on corner-exit, but will be less stable on corner entry (more turn-in).

More forwards weight distribution is the opposite.

Generally I prefer rearwards on tarmac, and forwards on carpet. You see this in TC too with brass parts at the front on carpet.

I tried both full-size and shorty in my Vorlon and much preferred the shorty (mounted all the way back). Much more traction, which is important outdoors.
pphaneuf likes this.
daleburr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2017, 12:54 PM
  #71  
Dan
Tech Elite
iTrader: (53)
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,741
Trader Rating: 53 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by bdw11 View Post
Guys there are a few of us in Fresno that have 235mm pan cars we started playing with. I have the Roche Rapide P10W as well. Beautiful and fast car. We started running 13.5 2 cell blinky but no organized class yet at our club. What is happening on the west coast northern Cal area for this class? Any discussion on this topic?
We just had a Pro 10 race at WSR Fremont last weekend. Class is still small with only 4 cars competing that day. If only we could get everyone out at one time, that number would probably be closer to 10. The class is super fun running 10.5 boosted on a fifth scale track.
Dan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2017, 09:16 AM
  #72  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (60)
 
strodedawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 2,878
Trader Rating: 60 (100%+)
Default

Hello,
Just received my roche and will be start the building process. I will be running 2s blinky on gray carpet and was wondering on any set-up tips? swift 235 body and shorty lipo. was thinking on battery placement and electronics placement
thanks
Taz_S likes this.
strodedawg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2017, 04:54 PM
  #73  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (101)
 
LOW ET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: cleveland, ohio
Posts: 2,975
Trader Rating: 101 (100%+)
Default

what he said ^^^

which battery placement have you guys found to work best and for what type of surface?

im looking for asphalt info.
Taz_S likes this.
LOW ET is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2017, 06:34 AM
  #74  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (60)
 
strodedawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 2,878
Trader Rating: 60 (100%+)
Default

i have placed the battery in the front and 40wt in all shocks, but now I can't get the swift 235 body to mount properly. The servo arm is hitting the body and will not allow me too mount the front low enough, shimmed I would need to run full size fronts. Little info support from roche and the forums, getting frustrated. Mainly an offroad guy lol
Taz_S likes this.
strodedawg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2017, 02:17 PM
  #75  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (101)
 
LOW ET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: cleveland, ohio
Posts: 2,975
Trader Rating: 101 (100%+)
Default

maybe try a different kind of body. ???
LOW ET is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service