Belt conversion for factory team TC4
Just wondering why Associated hasn't come out with a belt car? :D
|
i wonder to :confused:
but i also read that they strive for the most low maintance and good quality car set-up at the same time |
i think the shaft is beter than the belt just my driving style i can beet most belt cars like the xray u get alittle more tourque wit shaft
|
not only tourqe but also FASTER RESPONCE :sneaky:
|
throttle and braking wise
|
i'm not saying the shaft is bad, but it would be great to have the option.
|
yea it would be also had for them to come up with one that uses the parts it has and porbly be expinsive
|
i really dont think the belt is what is making the other cars so much better, i would have to guess its chassis and suspension design,i think AE made a pretty copy of a tc3 with there new car, thats why they are slow.......IMO
|
you don't think turning the motor 90 deg. will help?
|
Originally Posted by BiggAlz
thats why they are slow
|
There is nothing wrong with a shaft design. Just look at how well Hara did with the HPI Pro4 before they switched him to the Hotbodies car.
Shaft versus belt is more fashion than science. Ira |
I think the belt thing is what everyone wants right now. It is thee rage at this time. Belts or shafts are all fast.
|
Originally Posted by nrtv20
There is always a TC4 in the A main at major races. Just look at Cleveland, might not have won the race but still there, Baker is always one of the top 2 or 3 to beat.
|
or x-ray
|
anothing thing with belts is as long as its not a single belt design, you can make combinations of one ways/spools on the belt shafts to fine tune the car.
|
All times are GMT -7. It is currently 05:38 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.8
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.