Belt conversion for factory team TC4
12-08-2005, 10:27 AM
#91
Tech Legend
iTrader: (51)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Castle Mamba Max Pro. Feel its power!!!!!!!!!!
Posts: 21,220
Trader Rating: 51 (100%+)
I guess toy cars brings the best out in everyone. Last I thought this was about making a TC4 a belt conversion and not about Xrays and onther cars. Oh well its just the way the ball bounces. 
12-08-2005, 10:59 AM
#92
Its just the way of the X-ray.....
They spend a ton of dough....
Don`t go a bit faster than they were going with a Tc-3....
So they have to tell everyone its better, justifying their mass spending.....
They spend a ton of dough....
Don`t go a bit faster than they were going with a Tc-3....
So they have to tell everyone its better, justifying their mass spending.....
12-08-2005, 12:54 PM
#94
Originally Posted by Soviet
Welcome to the internet. Accept what you agree with and reject what you find to be absurd. I was simply quoting a good friend who knows what he's talking about.
Whats up Mo?
12-08-2005, 01:50 PM
#95
Tech Legend
iTrader: (51)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Castle Mamba Max Pro. Feel its power!!!!!!!!!!
Posts: 21,220
Trader Rating: 51 (100%+)
Originally Posted by Jeff Cuffs
who posted about the same topic and why did i post that, help me out here
12-08-2005, 05:01 PM
#96
Originally Posted by wyd
I guess toy cars brings the best out in everyone. Last I thought this was about making a TC4 a belt conversion and not about Xrays and onther cars. Oh well its just the way the ball bounces.
12-08-2005, 08:11 PM
#97
Hey Keith
funny aint it!!!! some people just know everything.LOL
Mo
funny aint it!!!! some people just know everything.LOL
Mo
12-08-2005, 08:52 PM
#99
Someone mentioned lots of adjustability, etc. Doesn't the JRX-S offer a lot of that idea? And also has all the heavy stuff on the center line... Just curious what you guys think about that.
12-08-2005, 11:56 PM
#100
Originally Posted by Wild Cherry
Its just the way of the X-ray.....
They spend a ton of dough....
Don`t go a bit faster than they were going with a Tc-3....
So they have to tell everyone its better, justifying their mass spending.....
They spend a ton of dough....
Don`t go a bit faster than they were going with a Tc-3....
So they have to tell everyone its better, justifying their mass spending.....
I can tell you that I am definetly faster with my xray.
Not a knock on the TC3 or a boost for xray. Maybe I would be even FASTER with a corally or dare I say tamiya. Who knows. Just my experience.
Maybe you weren't at FW when Barry Baker at Peter Robinson came around, but I can tell you I wouldn't have even been close with my TC3.
12-09-2005, 12:11 AM
#101
Well...in the end none of it matters. The other car companies have upped the standards for a modern touring car. Belt and shaft debate aside, Associated simply does not match the plastic parts quality of either Corally or XRay.
Even though I love my FT-TC4, I still lust over the fit, finish and durability of the plastic on an XRay or RDX.
As far as belt and shaft...who cares. If the internal reduction is the same there really isn't much difference anyhow.
BTW...if I grow unhappy with my FT-TC4 due to maintenance issues, I'm getting an RDX.
You heard it here first boys and girls....Soviet may actually drive a belt car someday!
Even though I love my FT-TC4, I still lust over the fit, finish and durability of the plastic on an XRay or RDX.
As far as belt and shaft...who cares. If the internal reduction is the same there really isn't much difference anyhow.
BTW...if I grow unhappy with my FT-TC4 due to maintenance issues, I'm getting an RDX.
You heard it here first boys and girls....Soviet may actually drive a belt car someday!
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
