Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Awesomatix A800/A800R >

Awesomatix A800/A800R

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2275Likes

Awesomatix A800/A800R

    Hide Wikipost
Old 03-29-2023, 11:28 AM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Awesomatix A800/A800R
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: hanulec
A800R Released March 23, 2023 with two kit versions, A800RA (alloy) and A800RC (carbon)


Mid Motor Content ---

New Part Releases
  • January 2020 - A800-AM24-20 Servo Holder - combine servo holder and steering holder to one single part.
  • February 2020 - A800-ADC Advanced Damper Cup Set - Reduces the amount of rebuild routines. It offers the possibility to A) remove air and B) add oil into the damper without the need of full disassembling
  • January 2021 - A800-BDL - Body Downtravel Limiter, replaces SPR08
  • March 2021 - A800-P138LFA - 38T Pully Low Friction - For Gear Diff
  • March 2021 - A800-P138S-LFA 38T Spool Pulley Low Friction - For Spool
  • April 2021 - A800-C27MMX - Full Length Top Deck for A800MMX
  • May 2021 - A800-C01MMA Alloy Chassis - Battery position is shifted to the front to achieve a better overall weight distribution. Removes short arm holes. New narrower shape
  • September 2021 - A800-C04M1+7.0 Arm - narrows the track width for lower grip levels
  • October 2021 - AM180EVO Single Bellcrank Steering Update - AM180EVO is a direct replacement for AM180M5

A800MMX and A800MMXA Kit Updates
  • AM152/AM24-8 is replaced by AM24-20 in this kit (UPDATE 08.03.2021)
  • P138/P138S is replaced by P138-1/P138S-1 in this kit (UPDATE 25.03.2021)
  • C01B-X-MMA is replaced by C01MMA in MMXA kit (UPDATE 26.05.2021)
  • AM180M5 is replaced by AM180EVO in this kit (UPDATE 21.09.2021)


Below OLD Rear Motor Content ---
Welcome - please help to make this Awesomatix A800 wiki useful!

A800 Information
New Parts
  • June 2016: A800-SPR01-98 - The version of SPR01 springs with reduced angle of the tips bending. Recommended for using with new SPR02H3 Shock Rod Guides.
  • June 2016: A800-SPR01S-98 - The version of SPR01S springs with reduced angle of the tips bending. Recommended for using with new SPR02H3 Shock Rod Guides.
  • May / June 2016: A800-AM14A - includes new optional "longer" hole on steering arm
  • May / June 2016: A700-AM14-3 - removes the prior "longer" hole on steering arm
  • May / June 2016: A800-C04AL+0.5 - 0.5mm wider alloy suspension arm
  • May / June 2016: A800-C01B-2.25 - 2.25mm carbon main plate (best suited for asphalt racing)
  • May / June 2016: A800-D2.2 - Dampers that support a thicker SPR02H3
  • May / June 2016: A800-SPR02H3 - Thicker Shock Rod Guides for the D2.2 damper
  • May / June 2016: A800-AT41-2 - Damper vane for the D2.2 damper designed to work w/ SPR02H3
  • May / June 2016: A800-SPR02H - Stronger Shock Rod Guides for the D2.0 and D2.1 damper versions
  • May 2016: A800-AM19-4 - Currently used in the rear of a kit. With AM19-4 the top link effective length is 0,7mm shorter compare to AM19-2. Also with AM19-4 the flex of suspension is smaller ( similar to more stiffer arm and c-hub of normal cars). The screws on dampers are more accessible for adjustment.
  • January 2017 - SPRO2X - new for dampers and do not require a 98 degree bent spring.
  • January 2017 - New A800X and A800XA kits now available featuring 0.3mm longer front and rear wheelbase.
Kit Updates
  • May - Current: Kits now including DT10-2-1 bearing holders for increased side play and durability of the differential and spool.
  • May - July 2016: bearings within kits require oil before use
  • May / June 2016: C01B-AL (Khaki) Chassis with 0.5mm/side wider front arm mounts
  • May / June 2016: 2x ST17-1-S replace ST17 - See page 21 of manual
  • May / June 2016: Updated damper, D2.2, introduced
  • May / June 2016: Thicker Shock Rod Guides for the D2.2 damper included with kits, A800-SPR02H3
  • Jan 2016: GD2 Output Axle (ST31-1) update to use blue foam (P46) instead of set screw (used on each side of Axle after assembly)


Setups
Major Race Wins
  • 2016 Reedy Race of Champions - Modified - Julian Wong
  • 2016 Mile High Championship - 17.5 - Kyle Klingforth
  • 2016 Mile High Championship - 13.5 - Kyle Klingforth
  • 2016 ROAR On-Road Carpet Nationals - 17.5 - Mike Gee
  • 2016 ROAR On-Road Carpet Nationals - 13.5 - Mike Gee
  • 2015/6 ETS Season 9 Round 3 - Xray Pro Stock Division - Tony Streit
  • 2015 US Indoor Champs - 13.5 - Mike Gee
  • 2016 Roar On-Road Asphalt Nationals - 13.5 - Mike Gee
  • 2016 Roar On-Road Asphalt Nationals - 17.5 - Sam Isaacs
  • 2016 International Indoor Championships (IIC) - 17.5 - Mike Gee
  • 2016 Halloween Classic at the Gate - 17.5 - Brad Johnson
  • 2016 US Indoor Champs - 17.5 - Sam Isaacs
  • 2016 US Indoor Champs - 13.5 -Matt Lyons
  • 2016 Stock Wars - 17.5 - Mike Gee
  • 2016 Hudy Indoor Championship - 17.5 - Brad Johnson

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2018, 09:54 AM
  #3541  
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,981
Trader Rating: 19 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by phatboislim
When will those at21 lower cog pieces be available again?
Michael's has two packs in stock.
iTz Nicholas72 is offline  
Old 11-05-2018, 01:24 PM
  #3542  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
jdawg81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 225
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

I ran my mid motor conversion for the first time on black carpet a week ago and and have a few questions.


1. Has anyone tried the long arm set with the mid motor conversion on black carpet? If so is there any benefit to use the long arms compared to the normal length arms?

2. I purchased the AUSA-C01B-XAH-MM-3 right before the C01B-X-MMA alloy chassis was released. Is there any advantage of using one over the other?
jdawg81 is offline  
Old 11-05-2018, 01:51 PM
  #3543  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (239)
 
Marcos.J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Semper Fi
Posts: 32,994
Trader Rating: 239 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jdawg81
I ran my mid motor conversion for the first time on black carpet a week ago and and have a few questions.


1. Has anyone tried the long arm set with the mid motor conversion on black carpet? If so is there any benefit to use the long arms compared to the normal length arms?

2. I purchased the AUSA-C01B-XAH-MM-3 right before the C01B-X-MMA alloy chassis was released. Is there any advantage of using one over the other?
i have the long arms on mine with the carbon chassis and i got it pretty well set up i posted my set up a page back, i should have my aluminum chassis by Thursday, and ill be at the track all night friday saturday and racing sunday , i should have a good set up by then lol
Marcos.J is offline  
Old 11-05-2018, 02:51 PM
  #3544  
OVA
Tech Lord
iTrader: (86)
 
OVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: WASHINGTON
Posts: 10,305
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jdawg81
I ran my mid motor conversion for the first time on black carpet a week ago and and have a few questions.


1. Has anyone tried the long arm set with the mid motor conversion on black carpet? If so is there any benefit to use the long arms compared to the normal length arms?

2. I purchased the AUSA-C01B-XAH-MM-3 right before the C01B-X-MMA alloy chassis was released. Is there any advantage of using one over the other?

Hey Jason
I ran mine practices at the Chill last Friday and was n/p matching Brent fastest lap time ...I ran with the long arm
# 2 question the would be debatable
With the long arm the car got too much steering at the chil for my taste l.I had to turn down the epa and but it drive very smooth..
fyi you might want to run or use bodies with low front down force

Last edited by OVA; 11-05-2018 at 04:44 PM.
OVA is offline  
Old 11-05-2018, 08:40 PM
  #3545  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
jdawg81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 225
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Marcos.J
i have the long arms on mine with the carbon chassis and i got it pretty well set up i posted my set up a page back, i should have my aluminum chassis by Thursday, and ill be at the track all night friday saturday and racing sunday , i should have a good set up by then lol
That's a lot of track time. If you get it working well with the aluminium chassis please post your setup.

Originally Posted by OVA
Hey Jason
I ran mine practices at the Chill last Friday and was n/p matching Brent fastest lap time ...I ran with the long arm
# 2 question the would be debatable
With the long arm the car got too much steering at the chil for my taste l.I had to turn down the epa and but it drive very smooth..
fyi you might want to run or use bodies with low front down force
Hey Franko, sounds like even though the long arms gave you too much steering it was still fast. Did you try the standard length arms yet? I currently have the stardard arms on and I thought it already had too much steering. And I will be trying a Mazda speed 6 body next to see if it helps reduce the amount of steering.
jdawg81 is offline  
Old 11-05-2018, 10:09 PM
  #3546  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by jdawg81
Hey Franko, sounds like even though the long arms gave you too much steering it was still fast. Did you try the standard length arms yet? I currently have the stardard arms on and I thought it already had too much steering. And I will be trying a Mazda speed 6 body next to see if it helps reduce the amount of steering.
At recent ETS race Tim Benson was on podium of Pro Stock with +1,5mm front arm and +8mm rear arms on his EVO car.
Certainly this combination is interesting to try on MMCX car also.
Oleg Babich is offline  
Old 11-05-2018, 11:49 PM
  #3547  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (315)
 
nexxus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 8,947
Trader Rating: 315 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Oleg Babich
At recent ETS race Tim Benson was on podium of Pro Stock with +1,5mm front arm and +8mm rear arms on his EVO car.
Certainly this combination is interesting to try on MMCX car also.
So my understanding (and I could be off) is that the longer arms allow the car to roll more so suit low grip. The above set up would be trying to generate more rear grip

Noticed at our state titles here one of the guys running an A800X Evo was happy with his car on the practice days (running long arms) but as it gripped up he struggled, wheras my car came improved (A800X with std alloy arms)

Any plans (can I plead here?) for some more Alloy arm length options? +1.5 std and the +8 and +9 long arms would be ideal. There are a few of us here who run just the alloy arms as they are more consistent particularly as temps increase (and we're heading into summer here).

nexxus is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 01:39 AM
  #3548  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by nexxus
So my understanding (and I could be off) is that the longer arms allow the car to roll more so suit low grip. The above set up would be trying to generate more rear grip....
Our observations showed the opposite - the car with long arms rolls less. Calculation of the roll center behaviour at the side roll confirms this statement.
EAMotorsports and tbrymer like this.
Oleg Babich is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 05:26 AM
  #3549  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 163
Default

Originally Posted by Oleg Babich
Our observations showed the opposite - the car with long arms rolls less. Calculation of the roll center behaviour at the side roll confirms this statement.
thus oleg would you say that since it rolls less that on very low traction there could be a struggle? We are running on ultra low traction and the mmcx on the long arms suffers from over rotation at the back during mid corner on power exits. Back becomes rather snappy.
BD1541 is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 05:55 AM
  #3550  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by BD1541
thus oleg would you say that since it rolls less that on very low traction there could be a struggle? We are running on ultra low traction and the mmcx on the long arms suffers from over rotation at the back during mid corner on power exits. Back becomes rather snappy.
"Over rotation" is just a question of the balance between the front and the rear of car. The balance of MMCX car is very sensitive for example to the presence of the most front screw in motor mount and to the mode of ST55. On low traction try the MMCX car without this front screw in motor mount and without ST55.

Marcos.J likes this.
Oleg Babich is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 06:09 AM
  #3551  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (239)
 
Marcos.J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Semper Fi
Posts: 32,994
Trader Rating: 239 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Marcos.J
First time with the Mid-motor conversion on black CRC carpet and really liked it over the A800 with the Kaki chassis, lap times dropped about 4-5 tenths per lap and overall picked up almost 2 full laps over my previous week. We have a practice session Friday night then a club race sunday, Here is what i got so far but still tinkering with it. Made 2 small changes if they work Friday ill post them on here
Originally Posted by jdawg81
That's a lot of track time. If you get it working well with the aluminium chassis please post your setup.



Hey Franko, sounds like even though the long arms gave you too much steering it was still fast. Did you try the standard length arms yet? I currently have the stardard arms on and I thought it already had too much steering. And I will be trying a Mazda speed 6 body next to see if it helps reduce the amount of steering.
I have keys to the track and have the lap system also , I’ll keep you posted pm me your email and I’ll send to what I come up with Friday night
Marcos.J is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 06:26 AM
  #3552  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 163
Default

Originally Posted by Oleg Babich
"Over rotation" is just a question of the balance between the front and the rear of car. The balance of MMCX car is very sensitive for example to the presence of the most front screw in motor mount and to the mode of ST55. On low traction try the MMCX car without this front screw in motor mount and without ST55.
thanks oleg will definitely give it a go..

since you're here can i ask the main differences between the bssx and ls2 steering system on the mmcx car?
BD1541 is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 06:54 AM
  #3553  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by BD1541
thanks oleg will definitely give it a go..

since you're here can i ask the main differences between the bssx and ls2 steering system on the mmcx car?
LS2, LS1 provide smaller ackermann effect compare to BSSX steering at the same steering arms using. This statement is same for MMCX and for normal A800.
In general our linear steering systems ( LS1/LS2) suit better to the large fast outdoor tracks.
BSSX is better on the smaller tight tracks with high grip.
Both LS and BSSX can be adapted to the given intermediate track conditions via proper choice of the steering arms ( AM14LS or AM14A or AM14-3) and via shims under the inner steering balls.
AM14A /AM14-3 steering arms together with less shims under the inner steering balls increase the ackermann for LS1/LS2 and it adapts "LS car" to the smaller tracks/higher grip.
Oleg Babich is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 08:55 AM
  #3554  
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,981
Trader Rating: 19 (100%+)
Default

Is there going to be a C01B-X-MMA hard chassis?
iTz Nicholas72 is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 09:24 AM
  #3555  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by iTz Nicholas72
Is there going to be a C01B-X-MMA hard chassis?
I think C01B-X-MMA is quite stiff already. We even offer the softer top deck in the set with this chassis.
iTz Nicholas72 likes this.
Oleg Babich is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.