New IRIS by AME
#196

https://imgur.com/a/G7Vebm5
the front counterpart is behind the bumper. the coilover unit is the heave damper.
was really hoping someone would be gutsy enough to try a mode decoupling solution
for the life of me I can't think of a good reason why they chose that placement for rear toe link.
the front counterpart is behind the bumper. the coilover unit is the heave damper.
was really hoping someone would be gutsy enough to try a mode decoupling solution

for the life of me I can't think of a good reason why they chose that placement for rear toe link.
#197

I am very happy for Andreas Myrberg for finally pulling this off. The pictures are really nice, with a lot of good looking details, beautiful finishing of the parts with all chamfers, and I also like the fact that it is a different design language. Good they mention sturdiness, I hope it is true. Also looking forward to a more in-depth analysis. As I will design my own car (M-Class) I guess I will be busy chasing this. I wish Ruddog and Andreas Myrberg a lot of success with this!
#198
#199
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (5)

People say the Awesomatix is overly complicated. Once you're familiar with the design, it's a simple car to work through, adjust and maintain. I doubt the Iris is any different. It will have a learning curve, but unless there's something bizarre inside the dampers or diff, I doubt it's any more difficult than the Awesomatix.
I'm curious what the benefit is of the front pitch spring/damper. I thought 1:1 cars use it to keep the car from bottoming out at high speeds with large amounts of downforce. Maybe it's a good way to tune initial corner entry.
Chassis flex looks interesting. It seems like the back is going to be pretty stiff with the short rear top deck and no lower cutouts, and the front pretty soft. But it's hard to tell without seeing the car in person.
Is there a benefit to mounting the upper arm inner pivot balls horizontally? It seems like the Awesomatix upper arms are more simple and effective.
This car intrigues the hell out of me. I'm just happy to see a unique design and not another clone.
I'm curious what the benefit is of the front pitch spring/damper. I thought 1:1 cars use it to keep the car from bottoming out at high speeds with large amounts of downforce. Maybe it's a good way to tune initial corner entry.
Chassis flex looks interesting. It seems like the back is going to be pretty stiff with the short rear top deck and no lower cutouts, and the front pretty soft. But it's hard to tell without seeing the car in person.
Is there a benefit to mounting the upper arm inner pivot balls horizontally? It seems like the Awesomatix upper arms are more simple and effective.
This car intrigues the hell out of me. I'm just happy to see a unique design and not another clone.
#201
Tech Initiate

https://imgur.com/a/G7Vebm5
for the life of me I can't think of a good reason why they chose that placement for rear toe link.
for the life of me I can't think of a good reason why they chose that placement for rear toe link.

Look at Schumacher Axis or SST2000 they have them also in the back and I raced this car with no issue
#202

I wonder how u adjust caster ?
#203
Tech Master










#204
Tech Master

I think they copied the tires, there are 4 of them 😜
#207

I've got a feeling there's going to be different top plates to change caster . Like how mugen does it
#208

Time to sell my serpent 4x and get one of these.
#209

Ideally I think they just simply screw the ball stud in or out for both camber and caster adjustment. for fast and easy adjustments
Last edited by disaster999; 11-23-2022 at 08:38 PM.
#210

Beautiful piece of engineering. Truely out of the box thought processes. This would be in the same league as awesomatix's a700/a800, serpents project 4x series, the original gizmo gz1... haven't had my boffin genes so aflame with excitement for awhile now.
Good luck and have fun!
Good luck and have fun!