Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Best battery for 17.5t blinky >

Best battery for 17.5t blinky

Best battery for 17.5t blinky

Old 07-17-2014, 05:57 AM
  #121  
Tech Elite
 
Skiddins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Windsor, UK
Posts: 4,913
Default

Originally Posted by Bar View Post
I have used the IP 7600's and 6000mah all year, changed to the 6000's for better balance but all are still perfectly flat
Over 3/4 of the packs that have passed through the discharge bucket at WLRC (before I put them in the recycling at work) have been IP's, all different capacities.

When friends have asked me to check their lipo internal resistances on my meter, the Ip's always come out worst.
Their price is the only plus point

Skiddins
Skiddins is offline  
Old 07-17-2014, 08:07 AM
  #122  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,059
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Skiddins View Post
They still test out well on my ESR lipo meter
What are the results and how do different packs compare.
frozenpod is offline  
Old 07-17-2014, 08:54 AM
  #123  
Tech Elite
 
Skiddins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Windsor, UK
Posts: 4,913
Default

Originally Posted by frozenpod View Post
What are the results and how do different packs compare.
Most give me 3-4milliohms per cell.
My best is my THunder Power 6000, 2.96, my worst is one of the my old TP 6000 (at least 3 years old and thrashed) 7-9milliohms per cell.


Friends ORCA's etc typcally give 3-4mOhms per cell as well, but not sure if they don't tail off after a few months.

I know someone who did a lot of research on chargers and how accurate their internal resistance reading were and found the only decent chargers were decent Hyperion units.
Still don't fully understand how a charger can accurately give you internal resistance whilst it's charging
Skiddins is offline  
Old 07-17-2014, 12:33 PM
  #124  
Team EAM
iTrader: (79)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 9,504
Trader Rating: 79 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Skiddins View Post
Most give me 3-4milliohms per cell.
My best is my THunder Power 6000, 2.96, my worst is one of the my old TP 6000 (at least 3 years old and thrashed) 7-9milliohms per cell.


Friends ORCA's etc typcally give 3-4mOhms per cell as well, but not sure if they don't tail off after a few months.

I know someone who did a lot of research on chargers and how accurate their internal resistance reading were and found the only decent chargers were decent Hyperion units.
Still don't fully understand how a charger can accurately give you internal resistance whilst it's charging
I've found the ESR meter to be useless here. It varies too much based on pack charge. All of them have to have the same amount of charge or it will affect the readings.

The only thing I've found to give proper IR readings is a GFX or the I charger 4010, 308 or 406. This is when comparing them to a 4000.00 fluke isolation meter used to tet resistance in real electric vehicle batteries.

The GFX and Icharger do not take readings as the battery is charging. The GFX stops it for 2 seconds at 123 seconds into the charge to check it. Tha icharge takes it while it appears the battery is charging but it pauses for a brief second to check it and will update it all throughout the charge. And you can also check it while the battery is just sitting as well without charging it at all.

EA
EAMotorsports is offline  
Old 07-17-2014, 04:04 PM
  #125  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,059
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Skiddins View Post
Most give me 3-4milliohms per cell.
My best is my THunder Power 6000, 2.96, my worst is one of the my old TP 6000 (at least 3 years old and thrashed) 7-9milliohms per cell.

Friends ORCA's etc typcally give 3-4mOhms per cell as well, but not sure if they don't tail off after a few months.
Thank you for posting the result the TP packs are certainly one of the best.

Cell temp and state of charge has a noticeable effect on the results.

Using my icharger the 7200mAh 80C IP pack that has over 200 cycles now had about 1.5mOhm per cell when new (depending on temp) and produced near identicle results below 2mohm after 150 cycles.

I have had an older IP pack (about 2 years old at least 500 cycles) that I did comparison tests with earlier this year cant remember the C rating that was below 5mOhm per cell.

I also tested one pack of the Orion 90Cs that a lot of local racers rave about using the same charger and they were about 3.5mohm.

Maybe my charger provides lower IR readings than your but at least with comparisons of different packs we might be able to draw some conclusions.

Which ORCA's were they?
frozenpod is offline  
Old 07-17-2014, 04:09 PM
  #126  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,059
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Would be worth checking out this thread and the results posted.

http://www.rctech.net/forum/electric...d-results.html


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waBmuiv8v9g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qXbWNRjWGQ
frozenpod is offline  
Old 07-26-2014, 04:40 PM
  #127  
Tech Elite
 
Skiddins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Windsor, UK
Posts: 4,913
Default

Originally Posted by frozenpod View Post

Which ORCA's were they?
6200, the 7500's are too heavy to get their cars balanced.
Skiddins is offline  
Old 07-27-2014, 11:55 AM
  #128  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Mr RCTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,336
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by EAMotorsports View Post
I've found the ESR meter to be useless here. It varies too much based on pack charge. All of them have to have the same amount of charge or it will affect the readings.

The only thing I've found to give proper IR readings is a GFX or the I charger 4010, 308 or 406. This is when comparing them to a 4000.00 fluke isolation meter used to tet resistance in real electric vehicle batteries.

The GFX and Icharger do not take readings as the battery is charging. The GFX stops it for 2 seconds at 123 seconds into the charge to check it. Tha icharge takes it while it appears the battery is charging but it pauses for a brief second to check it and will update it all throughout the charge. And you can also check it while the battery is just sitting as well without charging it at all.

EA

100% agree...

The I charger is the way to go!!

I look at more towards how long the voltage stays up in the pack and compare that to other lipos..

Voltage is speed after all!
Mr RCTech is offline  
Old 07-27-2014, 01:24 PM
  #129  
Tech Master
 
mac853's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dirty place
Posts: 1,920
Default

How about the Zombie, eg: 6200
mac853 is offline  
Old 07-28-2014, 03:53 PM
  #130  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,059
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Skiddins View Post
6200, the 7500's are too heavy to get their cars balanced.
I have about 30 cycles on the IP 6000mah 90C/Orca 6200mah 90C.

So far so good.
frozenpod is offline  
Old 07-28-2014, 04:20 PM
  #131  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7,092
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Smile

The Ultimate battery for 17.5t blinky would be any low IR lipo pack with a supercapacitor attached to the ESC battery connector... Think about. The esc has capacitors, the Rx has a glitch capacitor, so why not the battery ??? The voltage sags will be eliminated, and the current draw will decrease. More punch, more battery voltage at the end of the run, etc....

Last edited by bertrandsv87; 07-28-2014 at 04:37 PM.
bertrandsv87 is offline  
Old 07-28-2014, 05:10 PM
  #132  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,059
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

The current lipos are excellent but the next evolution for RC might be the new super caps (currently under development). They can be charged in seconds and have well over 10,000 of cycles.

The current readily available high capacity super capacitors have a lower energy density and similar IR of the current lipos. Not a huge amount to gain by using them.
frozenpod is offline  
Old 07-28-2014, 05:17 PM
  #133  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (176)
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 5,041
Trader Rating: 176 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by frozenpod View Post
The current lipos are excellent but the next evolution for RC might be the new super caps (currently under development). They can be charged in seconds and have well over 10,000 of cycles.

The current readily available high capacity super capacitors have a lower energy density and similar IR of the current lipos. Not a huge amount to gain by using them.
Weight and size? specs or links? please
thecaptain is offline  
Old 07-28-2014, 06:58 PM
  #134  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,059
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

There are a number of papers that have been published from monash university.

There is an article about them here

http://siliconangle.com/blog/2013/08...cid-batteries/
frozenpod is offline  
Old 07-28-2014, 07:06 PM
  #135  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (176)
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 5,041
Trader Rating: 176 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by frozenpod View Post
There are a number of papers that have been published from monash university.

There is an article about them here

http://siliconangle.com/blog/2013/08...cid-batteries/
that would be very neat to see a battery that can be used in our cars like that. I bet theyd be SUPER light. Like 100 grams if that, and would last the entire race and be much smaller than the traditional stick lipo. Which would allow for radically new chassis lay outs! Or we could put them on our esc... and replace the standard caps
thecaptain is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.