Xray X1 - Formula One Car
#1891
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Don't listen to just everyone! If your running on the carpet especially the new black CRC; the solid aluminum is good. I can't give you a recommendation to asphalt as Ive not run mine on it at all. My self I did the solid main chassis and left the carbon rear pod alone. Its doing wonderful.
#1893
Tech Regular
#1894
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (141)
Don't listen to just everyone! If your running on the carpet especially the new black CRC; the solid aluminum is good. I can't give you a recommendation to asphalt as Ive not run mine on it at all. My self I did the solid main chassis and left the carbon rear pod alone. Its doing wonderful.
Does anyone know when Xray is releasing the aluminum chassis for the 2017 X1? I checked the part number and it is different from the 2016 X1.
Thanks!
#1895
Tech Regular
I am most likely getting the solid aluminum chassis. I run on super high bite black CRC carpet. My T4'17 came with the flex aluminum chassis and the car felt much better once i changed it over to the solid aluminum chassis.
Does anyone know when Xray is releasing the aluminum chassis for the 2017 X1? I checked the part number and it is different from the 2016 X1.
Thanks!
Does anyone know when Xray is releasing the aluminum chassis for the 2017 X1? I checked the part number and it is different from the 2016 X1.
Thanks!
#1896
I'm running the 15/16 flex chassis on my '17 at the moment since I had it lying around. The only thing I carried over was the 16' front carbon shock plate. The geometry of the shock stays the same but your body posts will change locations (back to 15/16 positioning). X-ray most likely did this just so people would have to buy new lower plates if upgrading to the '17 and for the sake of saying they updated something. Keep in mind the '17 has angled side links option too, but does not bother me.
I have the full aluminum chassis too which I ran exclusively on carpet before my '17. I can't tell a big difference between the full and flex although I only run on CRC gray carpet. However, both aluminum chassis are a huge difference over carbon.
I have the full aluminum chassis too which I ran exclusively on carpet before my '17. I can't tell a big difference between the full and flex although I only run on CRC gray carpet. However, both aluminum chassis are a huge difference over carbon.
#1898
Looking at getting into the F1 scene and have come across the Xray Xy370700 kit for rather cheap.
This is the original version?
The shop also has what I think is the newer version, Xy370701 2016 spec.
As a first time F1 driver is there any reason why I wouldn't go for the cheaper/superseeded one?
This is the original version?
The shop also has what I think is the newer version, Xy370701 2016 spec.
As a first time F1 driver is there any reason why I wouldn't go for the cheaper/superseeded one?
#1899
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
Looking at getting into the F1 scene and have come across the Xray Xy370700 kit for rather cheap.
This is the original version?
The shop also has what I think is the newer version, Xy370701 2016 spec.
As a first time F1 driver is there any reason why I wouldn't go for the cheaper/superseeded one?
This is the original version?
The shop also has what I think is the newer version, Xy370701 2016 spec.
As a first time F1 driver is there any reason why I wouldn't go for the cheaper/superseeded one?
#1900
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
It's not. I've run all three chassis and there is a difference in all of them. The largest difference is between carbon and aluminum. Then there is a smaller difference between full and flex aluminum. Full Aluminum dumbs the car down quite a bit (easier to drive but much less responsive). Depending on driving style and setup one may feel better than the other on a given layout/traction level.
All the major/mid-major races spec the Pit 571/572 combo which is the same as CRC and TCS tires (rebranded Pit 571/572). They are really good tires in terms of grip and durability and I would not look at anything else. There are a couple of setups that you can run where you don't need to glue them (inline, over-cambered and over-castored) but 95%+ setups require glueing at least the bead where the sidewall meets the tread (all I did at IIC this year). If the car still feels tippy or too edgy, then stiffening the sidewall with more glue will help sort that out.
Forgot to add - I prefer the tight fit of CRC rims (they do loosen over time a slight bit). The front rims especially because they don't crack at the inside bearing holder like others do.
Forgot to add - I prefer the tight fit of CRC rims (they do loosen over time a slight bit). The front rims especially because they don't crack at the inside bearing holder like others do.
#1901
+1. good advice
#1902
#1904
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
BTW .. which UF1 Midwest rules are you referring to? Do you have a link? The last version I saw was updated in 2014 and still had 21.5 motors and open tires listed.
#1905
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
It was the 21.5 based set of rules, I will say that it is a shame that uf1 can't update the site so new people to the sport have clear up to date info. If they want to attract new racers then at least give the impression that this is a current class. Just my .02.
I am new to on road racing and sometimes I feel like the rules favor certain vendors.
I am new to on road racing and sometimes I feel like the rules favor certain vendors.