Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree11Likes

Tamiya TB04 Pro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2013, 07:37 PM
  #151  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (108)
 
Core Creations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Back in the booth
Posts: 6,289
Trader Rating: 108 (100%+)
Default

What about slightly elongating the motor mount holes to allow a smaller spur to be used? Maybe tamiya will release different gears to lower the internal to around 2.0??
Core Creations is offline  
Old 09-19-2013, 09:17 PM
  #152  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,275
Default

Originally Posted by CraigMBA
Except you can't fit a 52 pinion in there.
Except the car is out of adjustment with a 76 spur.
Just saying.

I expect some update parts, but till then....I'm running my M03.
I'm missing something here. If a 76 tooth spur fits. Why wouldn't a 68 tooth? And instead of that stupid motor adaptor. Try using some tamiya spacers instead. It should hold the motor in place just fine. That should/ might give the proper clearance needed for the larger pinions.
Juan Aveytia is offline  
Old 09-19-2013, 09:28 PM
  #153  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (22)
 
CraigMBA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Valley of the Dirt, CA
Posts: 2,838
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Juan Aveytia
I'm missing something here. If a 76 tooth spur fits. Why wouldn't a 68 tooth? And instead of that stupid motor adaptor. Try using some tamiya spacers instead. It should hold the motor in place just fine. That should/ might give the proper clearance needed for the larger pinions.
Because you are out of adjustment to make the gear mesh tighter already. When you go to a smaller spur, it will open it up even more.

Further slotting of the adjustment holes would help.

Who makes a 68 tooth 64 pitch spur? Just curious.
CraigMBA is offline  
Old 09-19-2013, 09:44 PM
  #154  
Dan
Tech Champion
iTrader: (75)
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,327
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Default

Smallest 64p spur gear I've seen is 71T. I'd like to know if there are smaller spurs too.
Dan is offline  
Old 09-19-2013, 10:10 PM
  #155  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Racing4Evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,118
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I will stick to my TB03R. I'm no longer impressed. What happen to the short shocks? I think I'll just try to put 418 arms on my TB03 and call it a day.
Racing4Evo is offline  
Old 09-19-2013, 10:17 PM
  #156  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Airflow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manila
Posts: 823
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

I don't have a TB03R and it's been 2 years living with direct drives and belt drive kits, so the TB04pro is a welcome addition to my garage. Always wanted a modern shaft drive kit but not the TT01/02 series or the TC4.
Airflow is offline  
Old 09-20-2013, 02:19 AM
  #157  
Tech Master
iTrader: (21)
 
Sith Lord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Canberra, ACT, Australia
Posts: 1,405
Trader Rating: 21 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by daktulos
OK to excited here the quick way of doing it !
When I measure for the sleeve to sleeve it was with just the screws not with the spacer in place...
So the real measurement is 20.90mm and the max pinion size without tempering with the sleeve is 49T...for a 3.88 FDR
I will correct my first post.
Originally Posted by Juan Aveytia
I'm missing something here. If a 76 tooth spur fits. Why wouldn't a 68 tooth? And instead of that stupid motor adaptor. Try using some tamiya spacers instead. It should hold the motor in place just fine. That should/ might give the proper clearance needed for the larger pinions.
You can see in the middle pic that the motor/pinion is already as far over to the left as it can possible go (see the screws in the motor mount?). If you go a smaller spur, the pinion won't reach and they won't mesh.

Oh, the pics didn't come across. Check out the pics just one page back.
Sith Lord is offline  
Old 09-20-2013, 03:55 AM
  #158  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
daktulos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Montréal
Posts: 140
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Sorry if I was not clear enough English is not my first language
I only use 64P for my calculation and as you can see in the picture the motor at the maximum position is almost touching the chassis and gearbox...

You may be able to go a teeth or two on both ways with more dremeling but not really more. So 3.5 or 3.6 may be doable but I think the effort is not worth it...better concentrate the effort to make a conversion with a new motor mount.
Attached Thumbnails Tamiya TB04 Pro-2013-09-19-19.26.48.jpg  
daktulos is offline  
Old 09-20-2013, 04:41 AM
  #159  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,275
Default

Originally Posted by CraigMBA
Because you are out of adjustment to make the gear mesh tighter already. When you go to a smaller spur, it will open it up even more.

Further slotting of the adjustment holes would help.

Who makes a 68 tooth 64 pitch spur? Just curious.
I have a 68 tooth spur on my evo5. I don't remember the brand. If it helps I purchased it at NorCal hobbies. And going up in pinion sieze, it should mesh. I would definetly open the motor holes up anyways. Won't hurt anything, but will make your life a little easier meshing gears

Last edited by Juan Aveytia; 09-20-2013 at 04:42 AM. Reason: Spelling
Juan Aveytia is offline  
Old 09-20-2013, 07:42 AM
  #160  
Tech Master
 
mac853's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dirty place
Posts: 1,981
Questions??

Could somebody tell me the biggest 48p spur gear could put in there?

Best regards
mac853 is offline  
Old 09-20-2013, 09:30 AM
  #161  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (26)
 
Hebiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 12,922
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

LOL...tamiya totally f#cked this one up didnt they?
Hebiki is offline  
Old 09-20-2013, 10:00 AM
  #162  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Airflow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manila
Posts: 823
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

It's too early judge this kit. Lap times will tell if the overall package is crap or brilliant or just typical tamiya tub chassis performance.
Airflow is offline  
Old 09-20-2013, 10:07 AM
  #163  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (54)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ashland city tn
Posts: 2,705
Trader Rating: 54 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Hebiki
LOL...tamiya totally f#cked this one up didnt they?
im starting to agree .....only way to make it up to us is a MS version with new motor spacer and new motor mount .....im holding my breath .....not
rkhess is offline  
Old 09-20-2013, 10:19 AM
  #164  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (26)
 
Hebiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 12,922
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Airflow
It's too early judge this kit. Lap times will tell if the overall package is crap or brilliant or just typical tamiya tub chassis performance.
too early? timing is just right. If you cant hit the correct FDR.. i dont care if Masami is driving the car, your lap times will suffer.

Originally Posted by rkhess
im starting to agree .....only way to make it up to us is a MS version with new motor spacer and new motor mount .....im holding my breath .....not
yah but that still doesnt leave it as a viable option for GT2 class participants here in the U.S.
Hebiki is offline  
Old 09-20-2013, 10:24 AM
  #165  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,326
Default

Originally Posted by Hebiki
too early? timing is just right. If you cant hit the correct FDR.. i dont care if Masami is driving the car, your lap times will suffer.



yah but that still doesnt leave it as a viable option for GT2 class participants here in the U.S.
It probably was only designed to be run in TGP. People still compete with brushed motors there.
redbones is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.