TRF417V5 VS XRAY T4
#4
Tech Addict
iTrader: (9)
Lots of questions come up when you ask a question.
What surface? (carpet or asphalt)
parts supply?
popular car at track?
I had a 416X which was very nice car as for looks and quality. As for getting around the indoor carpet track. I was not happy with the results. Trying to find parts for the Tamiya is very hard to get in the US. They have about 3 different part numbers and it seem the most needed parts are out of stock. I think the car on asphalt would be a great car but on carpet it is not to be desired in the states.
Go Xray! Everything the Tamiya is lacking the Xray excels in!
What surface? (carpet or asphalt)
parts supply?
popular car at track?
I had a 416X which was very nice car as for looks and quality. As for getting around the indoor carpet track. I was not happy with the results. Trying to find parts for the Tamiya is very hard to get in the US. They have about 3 different part numbers and it seem the most needed parts are out of stock. I think the car on asphalt would be a great car but on carpet it is not to be desired in the states.
Go Xray! Everything the Tamiya is lacking the Xray excels in!
#7
In all honesty I don't think the latest Tamiya is a good as years past.
It's not as good on carpet (never Tamiya's best surface) and everyone I know who owns one has bought a Raceberry conversion, which uses BD7 parts!
I believe at the moment the best car on carpet is the BD7, the T4 is a better all rounder.
Skiddins
It's not as good on carpet (never Tamiya's best surface) and everyone I know who owns one has bought a Raceberry conversion, which uses BD7 parts!
I believe at the moment the best car on carpet is the BD7, the T4 is a better all rounder.
Skiddins
#8
In all honesty I don't think the latest Tamiya is a good as years past.
It's not as good on carpet (never Tamiya's best surface) and everyone I know who owns one has bought a Raceberry conversion, which uses BD7 parts!
I believe at the moment the best car on carpet is the BD7, the T4 is a better all rounder.
Skiddins
It's not as good on carpet (never Tamiya's best surface) and everyone I know who owns one has bought a Raceberry conversion, which uses BD7 parts!
I believe at the moment the best car on carpet is the BD7, the T4 is a better all rounder.
Skiddins
I will be only running on asphalt.
#9
#10
Tech Master
Do you have any tips on the Raceberry? My mate didnt really like it so went back to the V5 and it seems to have clicked with him and he is loving it.
Getting on topic, both are good cars, T4 is a belter, the TRF is harder to set-up although once working is rapid.
The thing I found (and some others) is that TRF 417's don't like front gear diffs unless they have really thick oils (500k). They handle better with the spool as they have a lot of front end. Also Ackerman makes a lot of difference when running on Carpet to calm the back end.
Getting on topic, both are good cars, T4 is a belter, the TRF is harder to set-up although once working is rapid.
The thing I found (and some others) is that TRF 417's don't like front gear diffs unless they have really thick oils (500k). They handle better with the spool as they have a lot of front end. Also Ackerman makes a lot of difference when running on Carpet to calm the back end.
#12
Just spoke to my mate again, he's loving the softer gooseberry conversion.
He described the original v5 chassis as good but inconsistent.
Everyone who tried the harder conversion hated it and went slower.
I do recall one guy hated it so much it changed back in between rounds and went 8s faster.
I'm not saying the 417v5 is bad. But you might want to consider trying one if you can to see if it's what you're after.
Several guys have mentioned that Tamiya's cars used to be better, particularly on asphalt, than anyone else's. Problem for them is the other manufacturers have caught up.
Skiddins
He described the original v5 chassis as good but inconsistent.
Everyone who tried the harder conversion hated it and went slower.
I do recall one guy hated it so much it changed back in between rounds and went 8s faster.
I'm not saying the 417v5 is bad. But you might want to consider trying one if you can to see if it's what you're after.
Several guys have mentioned that Tamiya's cars used to be better, particularly on asphalt, than anyone else's. Problem for them is the other manufacturers have caught up.
Skiddins
#14
Tech Champion
iTrader: (34)
Just spoke to my mate again, he's loving the softer gooseberry conversion.
He described the original v5 chassis as good but inconsistent.
Everyone who tried the harder conversion hated it and went slower.
I do recall one guy hated it so much it changed back in between rounds and went 8s faster.
I'm not saying the 417v5 is bad. But you might want to consider trying one if you can to see if it's what you're after.
Several guys have mentioned that Tamiya's cars used to be better, particularly on asphalt, than anyone else's. Problem for them is the other manufacturers have caught up.
Skiddins
He described the original v5 chassis as good but inconsistent.
Everyone who tried the harder conversion hated it and went slower.
I do recall one guy hated it so much it changed back in between rounds and went 8s faster.
I'm not saying the 417v5 is bad. But you might want to consider trying one if you can to see if it's what you're after.
Several guys have mentioned that Tamiya's cars used to be better, particularly on asphalt, than anyone else's. Problem for them is the other manufacturers have caught up.
Skiddins
Back on topic, they are both great cars and as good as each other. I've driven well set up examples of both and they felt very similar, the tammy was a bit more free while the xray was more stable but it was probably set up. Best to choose a car based on what people are running at your club and parts availability