R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-10-2006, 03:49 PM   #766
Tech Champion
 
Kevin K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: In a land of mini-mighty mental giants
Posts: 8,833
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Send a message via AIM to Kevin K Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin K
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRF415boy
Good question. I would say that there is a caster block at the bottom of the hub but it's hard to tell how it's made with the pictures we have. Remember it doesn't have to be in C-shape to provide caster, as long as it holds the hub at a certain angle.
Yeah I can see where he has a castor block on the bottom of the knuckle but then the top of the knuckle would be free to move forward and rearward with a camber link wouldnt it???? If there was an upper arm that would triangulate it all I can see how it wouldn’t move but with a tie rod I don’t see how it would hold the caster consistent. I have broken caster blocks before and the bottom has been fine but with out it all there it made the handling very inconsistent so Im not sure how hes able to get it all to work.
__________________
2013 USVTA World Champion of the World
MOTIV RC presents the Midwest All-Star Carpet Series....15th year running 2017/18!!!
USVTA National Championship....check it out!!!
Im only responsible for what I say NOT what you understand.
Kevin K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 03:53 PM   #767
Tech Master
 
TRF415boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,857
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin K
Yeah I can see where he has a castor block on the bottom of the knuckle but then the top of the knuckle would be free to move forward and rearward with a camber link wouldnt it???? If there was an upper arm that would triangulate it all I can see how it wouldn’t move but with a tie rod I don’t see how it would hold the caster consistent. I have broken caster blocks before and the bottom has been fine but with out it all there it made the handling very inconsistent so Im not sure how hes able to get it all to work.
Maybe he has a design that provides sufficient rigidity without the top part of it, that's why i say without better pictures it's hard to tell...
TRF415boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 03:53 PM   #768
Tech Elite
 
Turbonium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,302
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Send a message via Yahoo to Turbonium
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRF415boy
I don't get you
s'ok....

the point i was trying to make is that on the previous posts, you said the shaft car was scrapped, made into an offroader... then you say they are going to make both...

i dont have any inside sources anywhere, but if/when the belt car is released, ill try one. i have had some decent success with the shaft car in the past few weeks locally... builds nice, just wish it had some nice red alloy gearcases.
__________________
Wes

Team Novak
Turbonium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 04:02 PM   #769
Tech Elite
 
PaintingRoly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I got your force right here
Posts: 2,822
Trader Rating: 56 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPEEDx971
Hi all,

I read this thread from the first day and i know quiet a few on this thread, even some Kyosho employees or Kyosho good lads who wrote a few things...

But i see you,PaintingRoly, all the time, telling people that you know much more than anyone else.... You have seen that or you even know Cyrul plans... So good for you but so bad for the public........

I must say that most infos you put in this thread are wrong, i don't know where you get those info but change source...

I don't want to defend TRFBOY, but i have to say that his info are good even sometimes so good that i thought he was working at Kyosho... But i know he does not...

By the way, did you ever built a Kyosho TF5, because there isn't any phillips screw in the kit and wont have any in the Stallion. So get off of the thread and the "source" tells you better for you to buy a Nikko instead of a Kyosho.

Kyosho aim and exist by true Fan............

Thank you

PS: Be friend not a fool!!! I well know TRFBOY source's and i can tell you that he might be standing behind you and then kick you out of any Kyosho events or team,...or even more....It's just toys we race so think about it...

I never claim to have "sources"

as far as getting kicked out of events or team thats funny
__________________
follow me @RC3grafix on Instagram for pictures of my paint work.
PaintingRoly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 04:05 PM   #770
Tech Master
 
TRF415boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,857
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbonium
s'ok....

the point i was trying to make is that on the previous posts, you said the shaft car was scrapped, made into an offroader... then you say they are going to make both...

i dont have any inside sources anywhere, but if/when the belt car is released, ill try one. i have had some decent success with the shaft car in the past few weeks locally... builds nice, just wish it had some nice red alloy gearcases.
I NEVER said the shaft was going to be scrapped or made into an off roader. Please don't quote me out of context, the first post you quoted was a reply to someone asking if the shaft car was being scrapped for sure, so i pointed towards my posts of page 5 where I say the shaft car was being put into production.
TRF415boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 04:14 PM   #771
Tech Elite
 
kewdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sneederville, USA
Posts: 3,311
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Car #1 gets my vote!
__________________
Quinn Moon

Trinity / Epic / Revtech / VBC Racing USA / Mugen Seiki / Hot Race Tyres / SkyRocket Racing / SUPAFAST RC
kewdawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 04:15 PM   #772
Tech Elite
 
litespeed-dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 3,990
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Take this crap to PM, please!

Dom
__________________
Team Kyosho America - Team Br00d Racing - Team R/C Plus - GQ Racing Tyres - Slapmaster Tools - FSX Racing
litespeed-dom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 10:03 PM   #773
TFR
Tech Master
 
TFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,767
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

TF5 Stallion release date in Japan July 31st.

http://www.kyosho.co.jp/web/new_prod...kit0607-j.html
__________________
Muchmore l AHRP l Xenon l Futaba
TFR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 11:40 PM   #774
Tech Champion
 
SpeedTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 6,028
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Hi Guys,

Just want to post a quick note that I finally got a chance to put the TF-5 on track last Thursday. So far the car has been very impressive Very sure-footed around the track and seem carry a lot of corner speed around turns of any radius. And like other shaft cars, the TF-5 seems to have that little extra more rip out of the turns which I believe would be advantageous in 27T racing

I just ran the box stock setup and mainly played with gearing and tire/insert combo for the day. I will be back on the track for more practice this Thursday trying a few setup changes to see what it does to the car.

Steve Wang
__________________
>>>www.SpeedtechHobbies.com<<<
SpeedTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 02:08 AM   #775
Tech Addict
 
Patriiick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: France, Land of the French Fries.
Posts: 587
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TFR
TF5 Stallion release date in Japan July 31st.

http://www.kyosho.co.jp/web/new_prod...kit0607-j.html
"good" japanese hobby shops usually receive them a few days before
Patriiick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 02:42 AM   #776
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriiick
"good" japanese hobby shops usually receive them a few days before
As UK shops will get them as well.....
J.Yves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 03:03 AM   #777
Tech Addict
 
Patriiick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: France, Land of the French Fries.
Posts: 587
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

and you sure know something about that
Patriiick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 04:35 AM   #778
Tech Master
 
Josh Cyrul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Farmington Hills, Michigan
Posts: 1,409
Default

Hey Guys,

Cars #1 and #2 are nearly the same car - the only difference is the motor and battery position - Car #2 has the Motor moved back. We had 2 different chassis as the WC for the Stallion - batteries forward and batteries back - This was again to try and test/develope the Stallion before it came out. Adachi/Ito used the chassis with the batteries forward and Mark/Tony used the chassis with the batteries back. Both had their advantages depending on the track conditions. I asked Kyosho if they wanted me to run the Stallion at the event or to run my design - they opted for me to use my design. I was just suprised they allowed people to take pictures.... This car is purely a development car (as far as I know). It's a compilation of new geometry and construction techniques that aren't commonly used. The style is to try and bring something new to the table to increase performance, increase durability and reduce cost. As far as the castor block design.... .... It turned out good!!!
__________________
Destiny, Ko Propo, Hobby Wing, Ulti Racing Tires, Protoform, Xenon Racing, Pivothead, Vizon, TQ Wire & Hella Graphics
Josh Cyrul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 06:00 AM   #779
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Cyrul
Hey Guys,

Cars #1 and #2 are nearly the same car - the only difference is the motor and battery position - Car #2 has the Motor moved back. We had 2 different chassis as the WC for the Stallion - batteries forward and batteries back - This was again to try and test/develope the Stallion before it came out. Adachi/Ito used the chassis with the batteries forward and Mark/Tony used the chassis with the batteries back. Both had their advantages depending on the track conditions. I asked Kyosho if they wanted me to run the Stallion at the event or to run my design - they opted for me to use my design. I was just suprised they allowed people to take pictures.... This car is purely a development car (as far as I know). It's a compilation of new geometry and construction techniques that aren't commonly used. The style is to try and bring something new to the table to increase performance, increase durability and reduce cost. As far as the castor block design.... .... It turned out good!!!

Well said Josh,

Hope this cool down and keep away crap off this thread.

See ya later.
J.Yves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 10:09 AM   #780
Tech Champion
 
YR4Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 5,625
Trader Rating: 44 (100%+)
Default

I just want to get back to talking about the TF-5 shaft car. However if there is a new thread for that then please post it.

First of all as I had mentioned earlier this car does NOT build exactly like the ZX-5 offroader. Many things are different. You can't just put it together blindly with experience from the offroad car. In fact, I just looked over the instructions and found I had put the steering carriage backwards. Thats because the same steering parts are put together differently on the ZX than on the TF.

First of all coming from a belt car (T2) I was totally unfamiliar on how to gear this one. I searched the manual and found no information on the drive ratio. So I guessed that it might be in range of my belt car and given the small size of the spur I decided to put on a small pinion 28T. OMG was it slow!! So I asked someone else running the TF also and he told me he was using a 39T That's huge!! Sure enough that was the proper gearing and it was for a Monster stock! Not even for the new blue motor which can be geared almost 2 theeth higher than that.

Okay, so how does it drive. Most notably the car was well planted in the rear. However it didn't push either. It had plenty of steering. In fact, I also got some on power steering coming out of the turns with good corner speed. My only problem with the car right now is speed. I'm guessing that maybe the drivetrain is new and needs to get seated before it becomes more efficient. Or may I should just change to the blue motor. Someone also mentioned freeing up the drive train by removeing the inner seals of the bearings. Maybe all of those things.

FLash!! OVA T4 owners. Your bodies will fit the TF-5 precisely without any changes.

Last edited by YR4Dude; 07-11-2006 at 10:47 AM.
YR4Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kyosho TF-5 Competition Touring Car controlledchaos R/C Items: For Sale/Trade 9 10-16-2010 10:18 PM
New Kyosho Touring kit from Championship r1champ Electric On-Road 4 01-22-2008 11:17 AM
FS/FT: KYOSHO NITRO TOURING CAR RTR FUJIMO R/C Items: For Sale/Trade 9 01-05-2007 12:06 PM
Kyosho EP Touring car ChadCapece Electric On-Road 20 03-20-2005 03:16 PM
Kyosho KX-One touring car slamminsam R/C Items: For Sale/Trade 4 02-19-2002 09:13 PM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 03:44 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net