R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road

Like Tree2Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-02-2008, 11:33 AM   #10051
Tech Regular
 
TeamGoodwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cottage Grove, WI
Posts: 400
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mok View Post
54083 - RC Short Reversible Suspension Set
http://www.tamiyausa.com/product/ite...oduct-id=54083

I'm guessing you'll also need shorter swing shafts (eg. 42mm as opposed to 46/48mm)

Do you have to replace the entire suspension ?

Or can you just fit the 416 steering blocks (and 1050 bearings) in the TA05-R LW front suspension ??
__________________
LEFTHANDER R/C www.lefthander-rc.com

"I've got 4 on the floor and a fifth under the seat"
TeamGoodwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 11:49 AM   #10052
mok
Tech Master
 
mok's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,075
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Send a message via MSN to mok Send a message via Skype™ to mok
Default

I would suggest that the lower arms need to be replaced, along with the uprights which possibly have a larger offset than the LW Reversible Suspension uprights (to account for the decreased lower arm length and maintain track width). Not sure though, never played with one or looked that closely into it!
__________________
XRAY T3'2011 / TEKIN RS PRO / LRP X12 / HYPERION SWIFT G3 RACE PACKS / FUTABA S9551 / SPEKTRUM DX3R
www.epracer.com - www.precc.org.au - www.westcoastmodelrallyclub.asn.au - www.onroadrccarclubbunbury.org.au
mok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 04:39 PM   #10053
Tech Champion
 
nexxus's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 8,104
Trader Rating: 302 (100%+)
Default

Whether or not you use the shorter arms depends on the track, the short arms require the 44mm shaft not the 46, for a tighter track like PRECC I'd use them, on a large flowing track like Bayswater I'd go for as wide a track as I could for stability and stay with the stock reversable arms.
__________________
A800 / A800X Awesomatix

Don't worry about what I'm doing.
Worry about why you're worried about what I'm doing.

"Ego is the anesthesia that deadens the pain of stupidity."

nexxus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 05:25 PM   #10054
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 538
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I thought Mok mentioned that the overall track width doesn't change, only the arm length?
stocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 05:26 PM   #10055
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 538
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mok View Post
plastic shock tower positions 1,2,3 correspond with carbon shock tower positions 1,2,3
the difference being on the carbon towers you have the additional hole 4

-Mark
Thanks Mark!
stocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 05:48 PM   #10056
mok
Tech Master
 
mok's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,075
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Send a message via MSN to mok Send a message via Skype™ to mok
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stocker View Post
I thought Mok mentioned that the overall track width doesn't change, only the arm length?
Thats the bit i'm not sure on.
I'm only guessing that the track width would stay the same

It wouldnt make sense to change it massively, but would make sense if the suspension geometry was altered enough to allow different characteristics in handling whilst maintaining the same or similar track width.
__________________
XRAY T3'2011 / TEKIN RS PRO / LRP X12 / HYPERION SWIFT G3 RACE PACKS / FUTABA S9551 / SPEKTRUM DX3R
www.epracer.com - www.precc.org.au - www.westcoastmodelrallyclub.asn.au - www.onroadrccarclubbunbury.org.au
mok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 06:01 PM   #10057
mok
Tech Master
 
mok's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,075
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Send a message via MSN to mok Send a message via Skype™ to mok
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mok View Post
Thats the bit i'm not sure on.
I'm only guessing that the track width would stay the same

It wouldnt make sense to change it massively, but would make sense if the suspension geometry was altered enough to allow different characteristics in handling whilst maintaining the same or similar track width.
** UPDATE **
Just came across a website with someone explaining track width changes on the short suspension arms.. they believe overall track width at the front is reduced by 3mm (1.5mm per side) and rear is reduced by 2mm (1mm per side).
__________________
XRAY T3'2011 / TEKIN RS PRO / LRP X12 / HYPERION SWIFT G3 RACE PACKS / FUTABA S9551 / SPEKTRUM DX3R
www.epracer.com - www.precc.org.au - www.westcoastmodelrallyclub.asn.au - www.onroadrccarclubbunbury.org.au
mok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 06:42 PM   #10058
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 538
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Does anyone use the inner-most hole (#1) on the camber links inner mounting position? Every setup sheet that I have seen on the TA05R use hole #3 or 4.
stocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 06:51 PM   #10059
Tech Champion
 
RCGaryK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 7,331
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stocker View Post
Does anyone use the inner-most hole (#1) on the camber links inner mounting position? Every setup sheet that I have seen on the TA05R use hole #3 or 4.
I do
__________________
Site Content Specialist- Surface
HorizonHobby.Com

Horizon Hobby is on YouTube with hundreds of different videos! Visit us at
http://www.youtube.com/HorizonRCdotCom
RCGaryK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 06:54 PM   #10060
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 538
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

In what situations would we want to change the position? want more camber gain in certain situations? Most only talk about moving the links up and down, but not in and out.

thanks for your inputs!
stocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 07:11 PM   #10061
Tech Champion
 
RCGaryK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 7,331
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

A longer link yields more traction on that particular end of the car. I've run the innermost hole for about 2 years on my car.I do also have them shimmed about 2mm as well. Perhaps a shorter link and a lower link would accomplish the same thing but this is just what I have gravitated to over time.
__________________
Site Content Specialist- Surface
HorizonHobby.Com

Horizon Hobby is on YouTube with hundreds of different videos! Visit us at
http://www.youtube.com/HorizonRCdotCom
RCGaryK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 07:21 PM   #10062
mok
Tech Master
 
mok's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,075
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Send a message via MSN to mok Send a message via Skype™ to mok
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stocker View Post
In what situations would we want to change the position? want more camber gain in certain situations? Most only talk about moving the links up and down, but not in and out.

thanks for your inputs!
Longer or shorter camber links adjust the roll center geometry of the chassis.
You can either raise or lower the roll center.

Lower roll center - CG has more leverage force being further away from the roll centre, which in turn means the car will roll more and generate more traction.

Higher roll center - CG has less leverage force as it is closer to the roll center, thus generating less traction.

Some useful info can be found here...
http://users.telenet.be/elvo/

-Mark
__________________
XRAY T3'2011 / TEKIN RS PRO / LRP X12 / HYPERION SWIFT G3 RACE PACKS / FUTABA S9551 / SPEKTRUM DX3R
www.epracer.com - www.precc.org.au - www.westcoastmodelrallyclub.asn.au - www.onroadrccarclubbunbury.org.au
mok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 07:36 PM   #10063
Tech Regular
 
HI_808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mok View Post
** UPDATE **
Just came across a website with someone explaining track width changes on the short suspension arms.. they believe overall track width at the front is reduced by 3mm (1.5mm per side) and rear is reduced by 2mm (1mm per side).
People use wider suspension mounts when using short arms to compensate for the change in track width. When I started using short arms on my TA05MS, I used 1E and 1XA in the rear and 1C and 1D up front. The only other change I made was to raise the roll center on all four corners because the short arms lower the roll center in comparison to the normal lightweight arms. With short arms, overall, the car feels quicker with weight transition. I am thinking that they are preferable except under very low traction conditions.
HI_808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 05:37 PM   #10064
Tech Apprentice
 
RielTime Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fort Collins
Posts: 72
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamGoodwrench View Post
OK thanks.

I'm positive I have more than 1.5 mm droop. We were all focusing strictly on the downstop setting alone, and not the resulting droop amount after lowering the ride height to 5.5 mm.

I guess I need to realize that a particular downstop setting alone doesn't mean anything -- it's the resulting droop amount with a given downstop setting and ride height that is critical ?

Thx again.

How did you get the ride height to 5.5mm? I've been trying to lower mine to about the same height. I ended up putting rubber o-ring on the inside of the damper body on the shaft and fabricated a 2mm carbon spacer that I put under the M3,M5 M5,M4 suspension mounts. The ride height is down to about 6-6.5mm. Haven't had a chance to test it yet. Thanks
RielTime Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 06:47 PM   #10065
Tech Champion
 
RCGaryK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 7,331
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Try the short shock springs and/or the -1 mm spring perches.
__________________
Site Content Specialist- Surface
HorizonHobby.Com

Horizon Hobby is on YouTube with hundreds of different videos! Visit us at
http://www.youtube.com/HorizonRCdotCom
RCGaryK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Tamiya TA05-R (TA05) TCS Legal limbohz R/C Items: For Sale/Trade 5 06-05-2008 08:58 PM
New Tamiya TA05 R touring car/motor/esc! Frost99999 R/C Items: For Sale/Trade 3 08-07-2007 12:24 PM
FWD touring car/sedan hellbilly R/C Items: Wanted to Buy 6 01-12-2007 06:22 PM
Tamiya TA05 full race sedan, Tons of Hop Ups lbckevin R/C Items: For Sale/Trade 13 08-29-2006 03:05 PM
want to buy a touring/sedan car traxxasracer Minnesota and North/South Dakota Racing 7 09-21-2004 06:36 AM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 09:23 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net