68LikesTamiya TA05 Touring Sedan
04-03-2006, 06:44 PM
#3679
Screw that concept... I'm gonna toss on the TechRacing 18t pulley on my 415 and keep my stock 35 pulley get an even lower ratio... 1.94444! Hmmm or... I could convert my TA05 pulleys on my TA05 to 415 pulleys!!! 
04-03-2006, 06:52 PM
#3680
Can anyone be kind enough to PM me the RC-champ pricing on the carbon components in YEN (53893, 53894 & 53895)
04-03-2006, 06:54 PM
#3681
Originally Posted by Besercoe
Does the drive train feel any smoother? more free?
Anyways, I'll run it head to head against my 415 next weekend. See what I come up with. I'll run similar setups as well (springs/suspension blocks/motor/gearing/shim setting/etc..).
04-03-2006, 06:54 PM
#3682
Originally Posted by danjoy25
Can anyone be kind enough to PM me the RC-champ pricing on the carbon components in YEN (53893, 53894 & 53895)
04-03-2006, 07:24 PM
#3683
Originally Posted by KilRuf
Here's my TA05 with carbon tub and TechRacing 18t pulley/belt set.
Have you tried with stock belt ? 'Cause I'm going to use those blue aramid tamiya option belt.
I also see from the pict, you are using the blue alum susp mount.
May I know what you're using front and rear ?
I probably want to order some of them also but I confuse which ones should I choose ... 'cause I'm not gonna get all those alum susp.
About these 415 alum suspensions, are those the same as the ones from TB Evo IV ?
Last edited by akuhon; 04-03-2006 at 08:21 PM.
04-03-2006, 08:52 PM
#3684
Originally Posted by Jam-ehz
...
For every letter difference, it's a half-degree, XD the shortest block, X is in the middle, and 1E the largest. 1X-1XD is 4 steps of .5, as is XC-1A.
For every letter difference, it's a half-degree, XD the shortest block, X is in the middle, and 1E the largest. 1X-1XD is 4 steps of .5, as is XC-1A.
Is this front susp. block is 0 degree (p/n TAM53685 front bridge susp. mount A) ?
I think I need 2 pcs of this type because seing the man. instruction for TA05 the belt (fr/rr) should go under the suspension block while 415 only fr.
Please inform me ... thx.
04-03-2006, 09:36 PM
#3685
Originally Posted by akuhon
Cool, ... I plan to get this pulley then.
Have you tried with stock belt ? 'Cause I'm going to use those blue aramid tamiya option belt.
I also see from the pict, you are using the blue alum susp mount.
May I know what you're using front and rear ?
I probably want to order some of them also but I confuse which ones should I choose ... 'cause I'm not gonna get all those alum susp.
About these 415 alum suspensions, are those the same as the ones from TB Evo IV ?
Have you tried with stock belt ? 'Cause I'm going to use those blue aramid tamiya option belt.
I also see from the pict, you are using the blue alum susp mount.
May I know what you're using front and rear ?
I probably want to order some of them also but I confuse which ones should I choose ... 'cause I'm not gonna get all those alum susp.
About these 415 alum suspensions, are those the same as the ones from TB Evo IV ?
Also, my suspension blocks are 415 blocks. EvoIV (original) are different. They sit 1mm higher. It was mentioned several months back about this. But all the blocks labeled.. "1X"... or "1C" etc.... are 1mm lower than the "X" or "C" blocks etc... Notice the "1" infront of the letter. I use 1A/1A"bridge" up front with 1A"bridge"/1C rear with 1degree rear hubs. But you'll find most setups with LW suspension with 1XC and/or 1XB as the inner suspension blocks for front and rear. I'm moving away from this for this year. Same with my 415.. 1A/1A"brige" front and 1A/1E rear (with 0degree rear hubs). This is typically my spool setup for stock/19t. Maybe alittle antisquat in the rear 1 or 2mm.
04-03-2006, 10:50 PM
#3686
Originally Posted by KilRuf
You can't use the stock or blue belts with this conversion. They would be too tight or short. That's why TechRacing included the white low friction belts.
Also, my suspension blocks are 415 blocks. EvoIV (original) are different. They sit 1mm higher. It was mentioned several months back about this. But all the blocks labeled.. "1X"... or "1C" etc.... are 1mm lower than the "X" or "C" blocks etc... Notice the "1" infront of the letter. I use 1A/1A"bridge" up front with 1A"bridge"/1C rear with 1degree rear hubs. But you'll find most setups with LW suspension with 1XC and/or 1XB as the inner suspension blocks for front and rear. I'm moving away from this for this year. Same with my 415.. 1A/1A"brige" front and 1A/1E rear (with 0degree rear hubs). This is typically my spool setup for stock/19t. Maybe alittle antisquat in the rear 1 or 2mm.
Also, my suspension blocks are 415 blocks. EvoIV (original) are different. They sit 1mm higher. It was mentioned several months back about this. But all the blocks labeled.. "1X"... or "1C" etc.... are 1mm lower than the "X" or "C" blocks etc... Notice the "1" infront of the letter. I use 1A/1A"bridge" up front with 1A"bridge"/1C rear with 1degree rear hubs. But you'll find most setups with LW suspension with 1XC and/or 1XB as the inner suspension blocks for front and rear. I'm moving away from this for this year. Same with my 415.. 1A/1A"brige" front and 1A/1E rear (with 0degree rear hubs). This is typically my spool setup for stock/19t. Maybe alittle antisquat in the rear 1 or 2mm.
How about the 53712 - 53717. They're options for TB EVo-IV susp. mount X, A, B, C, D, E ...
Are those the same as TRF415 51065 - 51069 susp. mount A, B, C, D, X ?
(I don;t know why E is not there for TRF415 ?)
About the belt, have you tried loosen the adjuster, yet ? It's only 2 teeth different than the orig. pulley.
04-03-2006, 11:40 PM
#3687
Originally Posted by akuhon
OK .. thanks for the info.
How about the 53712 - 53717. They're options for TB EVo-IV susp. mount X, A, B, C, D, E ...
Are those the same as TRF415 51065 - 51069 susp. mount A, B, C, D, X ?
(I don;t know why E is not there for TRF415 ?)
About the belt, have you tried loosen the adjuster, yet ? It's only 2 teeth different than the orig. pulley.
How about the 53712 - 53717. They're options for TB EVo-IV susp. mount X, A, B, C, D, E ...
Are those the same as TRF415 51065 - 51069 susp. mount A, B, C, D, X ?
(I don;t know why E is not there for TRF415 ?)
About the belt, have you tried loosen the adjuster, yet ? It's only 2 teeth different than the orig. pulley.
04-04-2006, 01:12 AM
#3688
[QUOTE=akuhon]Cool, ... I plan to get this pulley then.
Have you tried with stock belt ? 'Cause I'm going to use those blue aramid tamiya option belt.
[QUOTE]
what is the difference in performance of this blue belt?
Have you tried with stock belt ? 'Cause I'm going to use those blue aramid tamiya option belt.
[QUOTE]
what is the difference in performance of this blue belt?
04-04-2006, 01:17 AM
#3689
I think it's low friction and stronger ... other than good looking bluish-thing
04-04-2006, 01:28 AM
#3690
Originally Posted by dodo
if i'm not wrong, Evo suspension mount is wider than 415
And I see no reason to get E mount.
I'm gonna buy only those all 415 mounts with 2 pcs of 53685.
And plan to get the 53899 lt. reversible with the alum shaft (48mm) and steel shaft (48mm).