Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Associated RC 12 R5.2 >

Associated RC 12 R5.2

Like Tree24Likes

Associated RC 12 R5.2

Old 01-01-2014, 06:41 AM
  #646  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 900
Default

The impact of changing to a long-arm set-up is very small. As the front of the car rolls less than 2mm, the camber change is very small.

Putting a spacer between the upper wishbone mount and the mounting block will give a long-arm set-up and less camber change. Putting a spacer between the mounting block and the lower wishbone will widen the the front width. As H I says...

The bigger change in making the top wishbone 'long' is to lower the front roll centre. That reduces the tendency to grip roll, and reduces the 'bite' of the steering on high-grip tracks. I suspect that the change to roll centre is why this is done, and not so much the change to camber gain.

The lower roll centred will make the car softer in roll, and is usually accompanied by use of softer rear springs. Again, contrary to the usual thinking in On-Road, as the grip goes up making a 12th car softer helps.

Remember that 12th is the only car in the world with a hinge in the middle of the chassis. That means that a lot of the accepted wisdom of race-car set-up doesn't apply. When the main chassis rolls, it uses the centre spring to remain level. As the car turns, the front axle is levered around the centre pivot, the centre shock and the front springs - it's complicated! My experience is that roll centres and weight transfer (position of the rear pivot relative to the rear axle) play a bigger part in getting a car to handle than camber gain. HTH

Last edited by SlowerOne; 01-01-2014 at 07:54 AM.
SlowerOne is offline  
Old 01-01-2014, 07:56 AM
  #647  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (34)
 
RedBullFiXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Intergalactic Planetary
Posts: 6,542
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Cool

Originally Posted by bigcracing View Post
That's what I thought when you look at the setup that how I would interpret it longer upper arm and narrow front end and if you add on the lower arm it would give you a wider front end

Does anybody have a Mazda 12th scale body that we ran in the early 90s

Thanks chris
Like this ?

RedBullFiXX is offline  
Old 01-01-2014, 03:41 PM
  #648  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (32)
 
bigcracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 589
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Not the same we use to race it in the early 90s it didn't have a separate wing I thought it was a Mazda

Thanks Chris
bigcracing is offline  
Old 01-01-2014, 03:43 PM
  #649  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (32)
 
bigcracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 589
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Not the same we use to race it in the early 90s it didn't have a separate wing I thought it was a Mazda

Thanks Chris
bigcracing is offline  
Old 01-01-2014, 10:55 PM
  #650  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (31)
 
JayBee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 12TH-MAN COUNTRY
Posts: 6,819
Trader Rating: 31 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by SlowerOne View Post
The impact of changing to a long-arm set-up is very small. As the front of the car rolls less than 2mm, the camber change is very small.

Putting a spacer between the upper wishbone mount and the mounting block will give a long-arm set-up and less camber change. Putting a spacer between the mounting block and the lower wishbone will widen the the front width. As H I says...

The bigger change in making the top wishbone 'long' is to lower the front roll centre. That reduces the tendency to grip roll, and reduces the 'bite' of the steering on high-grip tracks. I suspect that the change to roll centre is why this is done, and not so much the change to camber gain.

The lower roll centred will make the car softer in roll, and is usually accompanied by use of softer rear springs. Again, contrary to the usual thinking in On-Road, as the grip goes up making a 12th car softer helps.

Remember that 12th is the only car in the world with a hinge in the middle of the chassis. That means that a lot of the accepted wisdom of race-car set-up doesn't apply. When the main chassis rolls, it uses the centre spring to remain level. As the car turns, the front axle is levered around the centre pivot, the centre shock and the front springs - it's complicated! My experience is that roll centres and weight transfer (position of the rear pivot relative to the rear axle) play a bigger part in getting a car to handle than camber gain. HTH
Damn...I have to wrap my brain around this
JayBee is offline  
Old 01-03-2014, 06:29 PM
  #651  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
ToysRUsKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cinncinati, OH
Posts: 2,656
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

My car was "OK" compared to previous runs this past race. I made a few changes based on Ivy's setup but i think the car can be faster or more consistent if not faster.

One thing I did notice was the car ran it's fastest when the tires got around the diameter of the setup sheet. I also noticed the front tires coned outward by the time they wore down. is that normal for 12th scale?
ToysRUsKid is offline  
Old 01-03-2014, 06:36 PM
  #652  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (31)
 
JayBee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 12TH-MAN COUNTRY
Posts: 6,819
Trader Rating: 31 (100%+)
Default

From my understanding of some 1/12th knowledge, coning is not acceptable. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong. And setups are cool and a nice base the majority of the time, but almost always they have to be tailored to what you like in the drivability of a car.
JayBee is offline  
Old 01-03-2014, 06:41 PM
  #653  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
ToysRUsKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cinncinati, OH
Posts: 2,656
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by JayBee View Post
From my understanding of some 1/12th knowledge, coning is not acceptable. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong. And setups are cool and a nice base the majority of the time, but almost always they have to be tailored to what you like in the drivability of a car.
It's hard to tell since sometimes coning is ok and other times it's not.

I only made a few changes based on the setup, didn't go 100% but the changes i made were positive so Ivy's onto something.
ToysRUsKid is offline  
Old 01-04-2014, 09:05 AM
  #654  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (50)
 
mike ivy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Comin at ya from a distant galaxy
Posts: 2,811
Trader Rating: 50 (100%+)
Default

Hey Dorian,

If Your Tires are coning you can Adj your camber + or Neg till your tires run flat.

Hope this helps
Mike
mike ivy is offline  
Old 01-26-2014, 09:26 AM
  #655  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (37)
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 695
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

.

Last edited by Josh Keller; 01-28-2014 at 05:11 PM.
Josh Keller is offline  
Old 01-31-2014, 04:32 AM
  #656  
Tech Initiate
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Antwerp, Belgium (Europe)
Posts: 45
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default body mount position

Does anybody know if the body mount positions are the same between a
RC12R5.1 (non inline ) and the RC12R5.2 chassis ?

I want to prep a body already but currently only have a RC12R5.1 ( non inline ) as a reference .

Thanks,
Erik
stical is offline  
Old 01-31-2014, 06:30 AM
  #657  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 66
Default

Originally Posted by stical View Post
Does anybody know if the body mount positions are the same between a
RC12R5.1 (non inline ) and the RC12R5.2 chassis ?

I want to prep a body already but currently only have a RC12R5.1 ( non inline ) as a reference .

Thanks,
Erik
same on front, about 1 cm back rear.
oddski is offline  
Old 02-01-2014, 09:33 AM
  #658  
Tech Regular
 
durtbag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: planet X in a distant galaxy
Posts: 401
Questions??

Does anybody know if you can use the 5.2 (V2)lower arms on the 5.1 front bulkheads? Or do you have to buy the newer bulkheads?
durtbag is offline  
Old 02-01-2014, 10:58 AM
  #659  
Tech Fanatic
 
RacinJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mesa Az
Posts: 828
Default

You will need the new bulkheads with the new arms.

The old setup screws into the arms and the new setup screws into the bulkheads.
RacinJ is offline  
Old 02-01-2014, 11:09 AM
  #660  
Tech Regular
 
durtbag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: planet X in a distant galaxy
Posts: 401
Default

Originally Posted by RacinJ View Post
You will need the new bulkheads with the new arms.

The old setup screws into the arms and the new setup screws into the bulkheads.
Doh! my bad. Didn't even think about that.
Thanks
durtbag is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.