Like Tree1Likes

Xray T1FK05

Old 10-04-2005, 12:21 PM
  #3871  
Tech Elite
 
teamgp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampton/VA Beach USA
Posts: 2,089
Default

Originally Posted by jamescam
teamgp -

Can you comment on the new shock rumor?


Honestly, I don't know. But I'm sure that if I was privy to any new product, I wouldn't be able to tell until it was official anyway.
teamgp is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 01:50 PM
  #3872  
Tech Addict
 
Scho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 584
Default

What was that FK'06 you was telling us all about?
Scho is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 02:25 PM
  #3873  
Tech Master
 
raving-monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: yorkshire, england.
Posts: 1,818
Default

Originally Posted by HarshGuy
Does anyone else think it's Ghetto to have to grind the rear arms in order to run foams? ...shocks ended up at an angle, so I dremeled out the back of the top shock mount as well to straighten them out as much as possible, but they're still at an angle.
i run rubber so no need to file my arms but if they are at such an extreme angle then you could space out your shock tower and mount the top of the shocks in front of the tower if you get what i mean.
raving-monkey is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 02:34 PM
  #3874  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (6)
 
HarshGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 3,379
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by raving-monkey
i run rubber so no need to file my arms but if they are at such an extreme angle then you could space out your shock tower and mount the top of the shocks in front of the tower if you get what i mean.
Then the camber links would end up at an angle, probably a "worse of the two evils" ...they're ok now, with modifying the top shock mount it's only about 1/4 mm off from top to bottom now, it was pretty obvioslu off before ...you gotta hog out about 2 or 3 mm of meet on the arms so you're that much farther in on the bottom than normal.
HarshGuy is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 09:12 PM
  #3875  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: HongKong
Posts: 84
Default

anyone had tried 3.0mm on asphat track?
any comments?
tsuiyuen is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 10:25 PM
  #3876  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sacramento,California
Posts: 716
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

harsh just run the inside hole the car works pretty damn good with there jilles setup from the vegas race has them in the inside hole.
bigdog is offline  
Old 10-05-2005, 01:20 AM
  #3877  
Tech Addict
 
eforer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 607
Default

A quick note on shimming the shock towers with ground arms. If you shim the optional postion standoffs too, the camber links are at a nice normal angle. I don't like the way my car feels when I shim the tower back though, the angle of the rear shocks has the effect of mild anti-squat which frees the car up on power, it also effectively softens the car up a little when it rolls laterally which makes it easier to drive.
eforer is offline  
Old 10-05-2005, 03:09 AM
  #3878  
Tech Champion
 
asw7576's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,792
Default

Originally Posted by teamgp


Honestly, I don't know. But I'm sure that if I was privy to any new product, I wouldn't be able to tell until it was official anyway.
Allow me to make suggestion for next release :

Front CF shock tower is too high, I could not lower the body because the shock tower touch the body ( for examples: Nemesis & Mazda 6 body )

FK05 motor mount is not effective to be use as heatsink. Compare FK05 motor mount with tamiya 415 & 415ms, yokomo BD's motor sink ...... Modified motor can't transfer the extra heat because the motor mount is just too small. Melted solder joint over 4 minutes in my case.

Higher front & rear upright ( like in engine cars ) so when I press down the car to ground, more negative camber may result.

Please grease the rear diff at factory.

The rest are fine.
asw7576 is offline  
Old 10-05-2005, 03:49 AM
  #3879  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
John Doucakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 1,144
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Seperate the bulkheads on each side in half and create accesibility to the diff with only 4 screws.
Just like the HB Cyclone, TRF 415 MSX, YOK BD, etc..

Make spur gear and belt changes a lot faster. You have to tear apart the whole car in order to change the front belt..
John Doucakis is offline  
Old 10-05-2005, 05:09 AM
  #3880  
Tech Addict
 
eforer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 607
Default

The Hyperform aftermarket chassis for the fk 05 comes with shock towers which are lower to allow for slammed carpet bodies, and the tower maintains the stock shock angle. The kit is also made of the highest quality graphite yet to be used in the industry, quasi isotropic cf with the lowest resin to carbon ration availible. Its a 3.0mm chassis with the bulkhead areas milled out so the roll centers are the same as the stock 2.5mm chassis. I've been running the prototype chassis for a couple weeks now and its awesome.

see the website for details.
eforer is offline  
Old 10-05-2005, 05:45 AM
  #3881  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 472
Default

Originally Posted by eforer
The Hyperform aftermarket chassis for the fk 05 comes with shock towers which are lower to allow for slammed carpet bodies, and the tower maintains the stock shock angle. The kit is also made of the highest quality graphite yet to be used in the industry, quasi isotropic cf with the lowest resin to carbon ration availible. Its a 3.0mm chassis with the bulkhead areas milled out so the roll centers are the same as the stock 2.5mm chassis. I've been running the prototype chassis for a couple weeks now and its awesome.

see the website for details.
Now that we know that its awesome, compare the the stock 2.5 chassis how much better is the feel say between 1-10.
Ramyuras is offline  
Old 10-05-2005, 06:12 AM
  #3882  
Tech Addict
 
eforer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 607
Default

On carpet its way, way better. Obviously its poor choice for asphalt or any rubber tire/ low traction application. The vastly increased stiffness due to the thick high quality graphite and the ultra wide top deck w/ standoffs makes the car more reactive (ie turn in faster and harder) and the car gains more steering throughout the corner. At a big race its a massive improvement but to my surprise its really improved the cars performance at the club level as well.

I believe Lino (the guy who owns hyperform) has a target price of $99.00 for the whole conversion which includes chassis, top deck and front and rear shock towers. All are made from the aforementioned high quality quasi isotropic graphite.
eforer is offline  
Old 10-05-2005, 06:56 AM
  #3883  
Tech Addict
 
Scho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 584
Default

I dont ming the bulkheads as they are.... multipeice buclkheads just cause tweak problems IMO.

What i would liek to see is ajustable front wheelbase and bigger diff pullys
Scho is offline  
Old 10-05-2005, 07:20 AM
  #3884  
Registered User
 
Pyramid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: ID
Posts: 1,945
Default

Originally Posted by Scho
I dont ming the bulkheads as they are.... multipeice buclkheads just cause tweak problems IMO.
No it wont, the chassis post stiffener between upper and lower deck are the one that will definetely create tweak after `hard` impact. That`s the reasons why in TRF415 being eliminated or not used.
Pyramid is offline  
Old 10-05-2005, 07:22 AM
  #3885  
Tech Addict
 
Scho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 584
Default

IMO - In My Opinion
Scho is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.